Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see what he is saying as stupid, in fact I tend to agree...it IS possible for the left (and I'm speaking as a member) to go too far, just as the right has been.
Actually I am denouncing blame as a toxic feeling. How did you not get that? It's like this. You cannot lift up a group of people without their consent. WE've been trying for 60 years, the arrogance of the ultra libs is stunning. Did they even ask the blacks how they wanted to be helped? NO
Hmmm...what does Maduro and Venezuela have to do with the Democratic party? Nothing...that's what.This is the element of the Democratic Party that is not only completely unacceptable to me, but is also largely responsible for its underperformance in 2020.
There is nothing more liberal than defending freedom of speech and expression. PC, Identity Politics and Cancel Culture are the antithesis of freedom of expression, and they are NOT liberal values.
Freedom of expression is not about defending words you like. It's about defending words you DON'T like. Without it, things like this can happen.
Maduro wields powerful hate law against remaining foes in Venezuela
Maduro wields powerful hate low against remaining foes. Reuters reviewed over 40 cases in which Venezuela jailed those who criticized ruling party officials, allies.www.reuters.com
Most of the internet is private..and free speech does not apply.It's a given that starting on January 20, the term "hate speech" will be expanded to include many comments that are currently allowed (even on Facebook & Twitter!).
I am guessing that the first thing that the new Attorney General does is to put out a list of words or topics that are now forbidden to be said or written. The only exception to this new rule is if you say those words inside your home or write them in your diary.
The Supreme Ct has already ruled that hate speech is constitutional. It's part of the First Amendment.
That's great -- on paper.
But in reality no one will be able to post "hate speech" on 99% of the Internet.
That's just how the cookie crumbles -- Constitution or no Constitution.
But it shouldMost of the internet is private..and free speech does not apply.
Um, I lean Left. I voted for Biden.Hmmm...what does Maduro and Venezuela have to do with the Democratic party? Nothing...that's what.This is the element of the Democratic Party that is not only completely unacceptable to me, but is also largely responsible for its underperformance in 2020.
There is nothing more liberal than defending freedom of speech and expression. PC, Identity Politics and Cancel Culture are the antithesis of freedom of expression, and they are NOT liberal values.
Freedom of expression is not about defending words you like. It's about defending words you DON'T like. Without it, things like this can happen.
Maduro wields powerful hate law against remaining foes in Venezuela
Maduro wields powerful hate low against remaining foes. Reuters reviewed over 40 cases in which Venezuela jailed those who criticized ruling party officials, allies.
Just another right-wing attempt to propagandize.
That being said...free speech is doing just fine in this country...as always..offend people..and they will lash out..nothing will change the fact the free speech is not free of consequence.
Its nice of you to say thatAnd "consequences" are not required. That is a choice. Intimidating people from expressing themselves, punishing people for expressing themselves, are not liberal actions. Those are actions of illiberal leftist authoritarians. We COULD just let people say what they have to say without fear of "consequences". THAT is liberalism.
I'll try to keep this simple:Its nice of you to say thatAnd "consequences" are not required. That is a choice. Intimidating people from expressing themselves, punishing people for expressing themselves, are not liberal actions. Those are actions of illiberal leftist authoritarians. We COULD just let people say what they have to say without fear of "consequences". THAT is liberalism.
but you just voted to empower the speech censors when you voted for biden
so the consequences of you action contradicts your words
After the democrats take office they dont care if you sgree with them or notVoting for someone doesn't have to mean that you agree with everything they say or do.
You just keep going.After the democrats take office they dont care if you sgree with them or notVoting for someone doesn't have to mean that you agree with everything they say or do.
you are along for the ride either way
You just keep going.After the democrats take office they dont care if you sgree with them or notVoting for someone doesn't have to mean that you agree with everything they say or do.
you are along for the ride either way
I don't know what has led you to believe that I care about your opinion of me.
If I played a part in planting that notion in your mind, you have my apologies.
Sounds good. Of course, human nature...not ideological position...determines people's responses. The left is no more likely than the right to take offense and act out. If you think not...just come here to Idaho and fly a BLM flag in your front yard!Um, I lean Left. I voted for Biden.Hmmm...what does Maduro and Venezuela have to do with the Democratic party? Nothing...that's what.This is the element of the Democratic Party that is not only completely unacceptable to me, but is also largely responsible for its underperformance in 2020.
There is nothing more liberal than defending freedom of speech and expression. PC, Identity Politics and Cancel Culture are the antithesis of freedom of expression, and they are NOT liberal values.
Freedom of expression is not about defending words you like. It's about defending words you DON'T like. Without it, things like this can happen.
Maduro wields powerful hate law against remaining foes in Venezuela
Maduro wields powerful hate low against remaining foes. Reuters reviewed over 40 cases in which Venezuela jailed those who criticized ruling party officials, allies.
Just another right-wing attempt to propagandize.
That being said...free speech is doing just fine in this country...as always..offend people..and they will lash out..nothing will change the fact the free speech is not free of consequence.
And "consequences" are not required. That is a choice. Intimidating people from expressing themselves, punishing people for expressing themselves, are not liberal actions. Those are actions of illiberal leftist authoritarians. We COULD just let people say what they have to say without fear of "consequences", and then engage them in the arena of ideas. THAT is liberalism.
There is no such thing as white privilege to loseYeah, we don't want to come from laws. And those who push this crap know that it couldn't be done through laws, so they've just pounded away at it, year after year, through the culture. They'll wreck lives and careers, intimidate and destroy, until they have the country so afraid to say a fucking word that they can control the conversation.
And when it gets far into the culture, it's much easier to turn it into law. As Maduro knows.
This has been playing out here for the last 20 years, clear as day. This ain't liberalism.
I was wondering how long it would take Mac to get back to whining about his lost white privilege.
Hey, here's the reality... we live in a world where thanks to Social Media and live cams, your stupidity will be on display for everyone.
So be careful what you post under your own name.... people will be paying attention.
Except that libs like you dont engage very wellWe COULD just let people say what they have to say without fear of "consequences", and then engage them in the arena of ideas. THAT is liberalism.
There is no such thing as white privilege to lose
Even if I were a loser and blaming others it would not prove white privilege existsThere is no such thing as white privilege to lose
Okay, you keep pretending that you being a loser isn't your own damned fault...
Even if I were a loser and blaming others it would not prove white privilege exists
It does not exist. It is strictly an idiotic progressive talking point
False on bothEven if I were a loser and blaming others it would not prove white privilege exists
It does not exist. It is strictly an idiotic progressive talking point
Well, you are a loser, to be sure...
But White Privilege is definitely a thing.
False on both
For a loser I prove you to be a fucking coward and uneducated fool every time and
White privilege is not anything but an progressive talking point. The very idea is racist
