Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some millions of illegals congregated in California where they were registered to vote automatically when they get drivers licenses
It's not a hatred of wealth.
It's the hatred the wealthy has for the middle class and the poor.
Circe, post: 19056907Sure, California is hiding the vast mistake they made, giving the vote to anyone they give a drivers license to.
Do you realize how extremely impossible it would be to hide over three million cases of undocumented non-citizens voting illegally?
You can't cite one single case. Do you realize how absurd your lie actually is?
Dale Smith, post: 19053294still boggles the mind.
What should boggle your mind is the fake reality claims you make and not one case gas been prosecuted in the fifteen months since Trumpo undeniably lost the popular vote,
44 states won't give some voter info to panel - CNNPolitics
Like I said - not one prosecution. Many of 45 are Red States. There is no defense for your lie.
All your web searches find absolutely no prosecutions in any state or charges filed against a non-citizen who voted illegally during the 2016 Presidential ekection yet you repeat the lie that there were over three million cases of that Federal Crime which means Trumpo won the popular vote.
Have you no decency, integrity or honesty left in your being. What happens to Trumpo supporters that they depart so permanently from the real world of facts, logic and reason in order to dwell in the fake reality world that Trumpo created and maintains for them
Trumpo tells the 'illegal for Clinton voter lie' and the suckers born every minute are permanently mesmerized by the Trumpo Lying Circus.
No one is for open borders. They just don't want to spend billions on a stupid fucking wall or want this country to just allow white immigrants.don't understand Commerce; I got, right wingers.Don't understand, capital plans only social plans?A market friendly visa could generate revenue from a market of about, six billion and growing.
It's funny that none of you wants to answer that question. Your dodge is duly noted.
A market friendly visa could generate revenue from a market of about, six billion and growing.
Another dodge, go figure.
So you are admitting that you are for open borders. Got it.
Perhaps we need a definition of "wealthy"guess this question is really for the libs since they lead the charge in wealth hatred. If you agree with my assessment that hate derives from fear or threat, what has the wealthy done to you in the past that makes you feel this way? Or is it you were told by the Democrat party to hate wealthy people?
Circe, post: 19056907Sure, California is hiding the vast mistake they made, giving the vote to anyone they give a drivers license to.
Do you realize how extremely impossible it would be to hide over three million cases of undocumented non-citizens voting illegally?
You can't cite one single case. Do you realize how absurd your lie actually is?
Of course it happens, but I don't know by the millions. You have to get caught for it to count:
Non-citizens caught voting in 2012 presidential election in key swing state
Illegal Aliens, Non-Citizens Caught Voting In Florida In Large Numbers
The GOP wealthy...It's not a hatred of wealth.
It's the hatred the wealthy has for the middle class and the poor.
Where does wealth envy come from? You suckers just gave the rich huge tax breaks which ultimately will eat up the peanuts they’re giving you.Could already be blue again you just don’t know. Look at AlabamaDale Smith, post: 19052461Project Veritas proved voter fraud and then you have 14 of the 20 states the Hildebeast she won with no voter ID law.
God, you are a sucker for fake reality. Most Americans voted for Clinton. Just a pure indisputable fact.
Not much "blue" on that map..............
View attachment 171382
We will see......leftards can only be in so many places at one time.
My bro makes over $500k a year. He didn’t need a tax break suckers
. Yeah well we have got to have some kind of label to describe the evil actions of those who do Hateful things to others. Good post though.Hate is not a word in God’s vocabulary. It is a man-made word that has no real context to real life conditions. All I ask is that people should refrain from using the word; either in writing, in thought or orally. Once done the term “hate” will fade away never to return again.
Just a suggestion
Hate is not a word in God’s vocabulary. It is a man-made word that has no real context to real life conditions. All I ask is that people should refrain from using the word; either in writing, in thought or orally. Once done the term “hate” will fade away never to return again.
Just a suggestion
Circe, post: 19056907Sure, California is hiding the vast mistake they made, giving the vote to anyone they give a drivers license to.
Do you realize how extremely impossible it would be to hide over three million cases of undocumented non-citizens voting illegally?
You can't cite one single case. Do you realize how absurd your lie actually is?
Of course it happens, but I don't know by the millions. You have to get caught for it to count:
Non-citizens caught voting in 2012 presidential election in key swing state
Illegal Aliens, Non-Citizens Caught Voting In Florida In Large Numbers
For you stupid fucks: Non citizens voting legally refers to non-citizen people in the country legally thinking they can vote.
When will you stupid ignorant people EVER get informed.
Perhaps we need a definition of "wealthy"guess this question is really for the libs since they lead the charge in wealth hatred. If you agree with my assessment that hate derives from fear or threat, what has the wealthy done to you in the past that makes you feel this way? Or is it you were told by the Democrat party to hate wealthy people?
If "wealth" is relative, should those "earning" multiples of the median household income be subject to tax rates that make it impossible to acquire enough wealth to inspire hatred among other citizens who believe great wealth poses a threat to their Democratic Republic?
The moral—and economic—case for progressive taxation
"In a typical sample of 1,000 respondents, only about 10 are in the top 1%. If you want to run for Congress, the implication is clear: Cut taxes on all but the top 1%, raise them enormously on the top 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001%, and leave the 1% the same.
"People will feel that you’ve made the taxes more fair, and you’ve also raised more revenue. In other words, make the tax system more progressive."
The top one percent pay almost 46% of all US income taxes; however, they pay a far smaller percentage of their income in total taxes when including local and state taxes. Since the 1970's we've seen rising economic inequality in the US that isn't likely to be reduced with raising taxes significantly on all those in the 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001% of all "earners."Perhaps we need a definition of "wealthy"guess this question is really for the libs since they lead the charge in wealth hatred. If you agree with my assessment that hate derives from fear or threat, what has the wealthy done to you in the past that makes you feel this way? Or is it you were told by the Democrat party to hate wealthy people?
If "wealth" is relative, should those "earning" multiples of the median household income be subject to tax rates that make it impossible to acquire enough wealth to inspire hatred among other citizens who believe great wealth poses a threat to their Democratic Republic?
The moral—and economic—case for progressive taxation
"In a typical sample of 1,000 respondents, only about 10 are in the top 1%. If you want to run for Congress, the implication is clear: Cut taxes on all but the top 1%, raise them enormously on the top 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001%, and leave the 1% the same.
"People will feel that you’ve made the taxes more fair, and you’ve also raised more revenue. In other words, make the tax system more progressive."
The top 1% pay almost 46% of all collected income taxes in this country. If paying nearly half of all taxes is not enough, then what is?
The top one percent pay almost 46% of all US income taxes; however, they pay a far smaller percentage of their income in total taxes when including local and state taxes. Since the 1970's we've seen rising economic inequality in the US that isn't likely to be reduced with raising taxes significantly on all those in the 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001% of all "earners."Perhaps we need a definition of "wealthy"guess this question is really for the libs since they lead the charge in wealth hatred. If you agree with my assessment that hate derives from fear or threat, what has the wealthy done to you in the past that makes you feel this way? Or is it you were told by the Democrat party to hate wealthy people?
If "wealth" is relative, should those "earning" multiples of the median household income be subject to tax rates that make it impossible to acquire enough wealth to inspire hatred among other citizens who believe great wealth poses a threat to their Democratic Republic?
The moral—and economic—case for progressive taxation
"In a typical sample of 1,000 respondents, only about 10 are in the top 1%. If you want to run for Congress, the implication is clear: Cut taxes on all but the top 1%, raise them enormously on the top 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001%, and leave the 1% the same.
"People will feel that you’ve made the taxes more fair, and you’ve also raised more revenue. In other words, make the tax system more progressive."
The top 1% pay almost 46% of all collected income taxes in this country. If paying nearly half of all taxes is not enough, then what is?
The top 1% pay almost 46% of all collected income taxes in this country. If paying nearly half of all taxes is not enough, then what is?
And you failed to answer my question: if the top 1% pay almost half of those income taxes for the rest of us, and that is not enough, how much should they be paying and why?
Ray From Cleveland, post: 19059607And you failed to answer my question: if the top 1% pay almost half of those income taxes for the rest of us, and that is not enough, how much should they be paying and why?
They aren't paying it for the rest of us, idiot. They possess twice as much wealth as the rest of us.
They are paying to protect their enormous wealth and assets.
No hate here. Just let them pay taxes in proportion to what they possess.
