Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

The Palestinians' Right to Self-Defense - Truthdig

If the international community will not halt Israel's Gaza attack and war crimes then it must concede to the Palestinians the right to self-defense under the U.N. Charter.

www.truthdig.com

Explicit calls by various islamic terrorist franchises and by Hamas and Fatah for attacks on Israeli citizens is not self defense.

When you endorse such behavior on the part of the Arabs-Moslems, you have no case to be made for complaining about the Israeli response to stop those attacks.

Put your Pom Poms down.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

Ariel Sharon sent Efraim Halevi, who was the head of Shin Bet at the time. The Egyptians, who were the mediators, negotiated with Halevi. When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Hamas leader Ousama Hamdan discusses the resistance movement, the Hebron attacks, and Hamas' relationships with Islamic Jihad, Islamic groups in Gaza, and Syria.

www.worldpress.org

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

The Palestinians' Right to Self-Defense - Truthdig

If the international community will not halt Israel's Gaza attack and war crimes then it must concede to the Palestinians the right to self-defense under the U.N. Charter.

www.truthdig.com

Explicit calls by various islamic terrorist franchises and by Hamas and Fatah for attacks on Israeli citizens is not self defense.

When you endorse such behavior on the part of the Arabs-Moslems, you have no case to be made for complaining about the Israeli response to stop those attacks.

Put your Pom Poms down.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

Ariel Sharon sent Efraim Halevi, who was the head of Shin Bet at the time. The Egyptians, who were the mediators, negotiated with Halevi. When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Hamas leader Ousama Hamdan discusses the resistance movement, the Hebron attacks, and Hamas' relationships with Islamic Jihad, Islamic groups in Gaza, and Syria.

www.worldpress.org

I understand you want justification and allowances for your misfit heroes killing civilians. What you cut and pasted isn't it.

 

[Hollie]

As is usual, before and during the Islamic holy month of fasting, gluttony and gee-had killing, the PA has been doing their best to incite the faithful toward creating mayhem.



The real source of the violence in Jerusalem

The real source of the violence in Jerusalem | PMW Analysis

“I fired my shots, I threw my bomb. I detonated, detonated, detonated my [explosive] belts… My brother, throw my blood on the enemy like bullets”

www.palwatch.org

Maurice Hirsch, Adv. and Itamar Marcus | Apr 27, 2021

• In the days before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, PA TV repeatedly broadcast a video inciting terror:

“I fired my shots, I threw my bomb. I detonated, detonated, detonated my [explosive] belts… My brother, throw my blood on the enemy like bullets”

• The video was broadcast 20 times between April 2 and April 10
• The broadcast of songs promoting hate and violence immediately after animated children's shows should not be seen as a coincidence, but rather as part of the PA's indoctrination of children

 

[rylah]

Another Telling Video From 'Haram al-Sharif'
(The Temple Mount)

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Sixties Fan]

[ Ramadan, Ramadan, Ramadan......we all know where it always leads]

None other than the Fatah party, headed by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. The international community considers the Palestinian Authority to be “moderate” and suitable partners for a peace deal with Israel.

This video shows a protest in Nablus with demonstrators waving Palestinian flags and yellow Fatah flags while encouraging death as “martyrs” for Jerusalem.

(full article online)

WATCH: Who is Encouraging Violent Riots in Jerusalem? | United with Israel

If you want to know where the recent violence in Jerusalem is coming from, look no further than the Palestinian Authority's ruling party.

unitedwithisrael.org

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinians cheer as Israeli barriers come down after Jerusalem Ramadan clashes

 

[Hollie]

Palestinians cheer as Israeli barriers come down after Jerusalem Ramadan clashes

Ramadan is a favored time for Islamic violence and mayhem.

 

[Hollie]

As you might expect, the Islamic holy month of binging and gorging is celebrated with the obligatory gee-had violence.

Abbas âsalutesâ Arab rioters in Jerusalem; Fatah promotes âintifadaâ âagainst Jews â | PMW Analysis

Fatah: “There is an uprising and intifada in Jerusalem” - Fatah ‎supports violent assaults against Jews

www.palwatch.org

https://www.palwatch.org/
Abbas “salutes” Arab rioters in Jerusalem; Fatah promotes “intifada” ‎against Jews ‎
Nan Jacques Zilberdik | Apr 28, 2021

• Abbas: “We salute our people in Jerusalem for their resolve ‎against the Israeli plans to take control of the holy city”‎
• Fatah: “There is an uprising and intifada in Jerusalem” - Fatah ‎supports violent assaults against Jews

• Official PA daily editorial: “Jerusalem’s protectors and guardians ‎have well understood that the elections in Jerusalem are a battle of ‎national sovereignty… the protectors and guardians of Jerusalem, ‎the brave residents of Jerusalem, have set the streets of the capital ‎on fire and have lit the torch of defiance next to its historical ‎gates…”‎
• Official PA daily editorial: Riots are “clearest heroic examples of ‎defending the sanctity of the capital and its holy sites”‎
• Fatah official “urges young people” to join Jerusalem riots and “to ‎defend the holy sites”‎ and official PA TV broadcast the call
• Fatah: Confrontations in Jerusalem “not temporary” but “a ‎confrontation between justice and injustice and between truth and ‎lies”‎
• Fatah official: “There are lions in Jerusalem who are defending it”‎

 

[Hollie]

With the UNRWA welfare fraud endowment possibly slipping away, Emir Abbas has the expected solution.

Palestinian elections: Abbas set to announce cancellation, reports say

The president is expected on Thursday to cancel parliamentary elections, citing Israel’s democratic restrictions on Palestinians in occupied East Jerusalem

www.middleeasteye.net

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is expected to announce the cancellation of the 22 May legislative elections, according to multiple sources and media reports.

 

[Hollie]

With personal fortunes to be won or lost depending on control of the UNRWA welfare fraud money, the Pally hopefuls will jockey for position.

Palestinian elections appear headed for delay amid Jerusalem dispute, Fatah infighting

The first Palestinian elections in 15 years appeared to be headed for a delay on Tuesday amid a dispute over voting in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem and splits in President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah party.

www.reuters.com

The first Palestinian elections in 15 years appeared to be headed for a delay on Tuesday amid a dispute over voting in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem and splits in President Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah party.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Gaza: Power Cuts Harm People with Disabilities

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Gaza: Power Cuts Harm People with Disabilities

Israel’s 13-year closure of the Gaza Strip along with neglect by Hamas authorities, significantly encumber the day-to-day life of tens of thousands of Palestinians with disabilities. Sweeping Israeli restrictions on the movement of people and goods, at times exacerbated by restrictive policies by Palestinian authorities, curb access to assistive devices, health care, and electricity essential to many people with disabilities. Chronic power outages in particular jeopardize the rights of many people with disabilities who need light to communicate using sign language, or need equipment powered by electricity to move, including elevators and electric mobility scooters.

 

[Hollie]

Gaza: Power Cuts Harm People with Disabilities

Live by the gee-had, push your wheel chair by the gee-had.

 

[Hollie]

It’s difficult to have real expectations that the EU will hold the Pally terrorists and UNRWA accountable. Hopefully, this is a first step.

EU moves to stop funding Palestinian terrorists, inciting textbooks

The new guideline doubles down on the European Parliament’s commitment to prevent EU donations from ending up in the hands of terrorists, by calling for proactive recovery of funds.

m.jpost.com

The European Parliament Wednesday reaffirmed its commitment to ensure EU funds do not reach anyone affiliated with terrorists. It also rapped UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, for inciting hate and violence in its textbooks.

The legislature’s annual budgetary report says the EU must “thoroughly verify” that its funds are not “allocated or linked to any cause or form of terrorism and/or religious and political radicalization.” Any funds that did go to any person or organization with terrorist ties must be “proactively recovered, and recipients involved are excluded from future union funding.”

 

[Hollie]

The article speaks to failed policies of the past which Biden seems keen to continue. The notion that hosing down the Islamic terrorist Pals with money and expecting them behave in a way different than their history of behavior Is just ludicrous.

Why Biden Should Not Give Aid to the Palestinian Authority

The Biden administration needs to stop rewarding Palestinian intransigence and support for terror.

nationalinterest.org

Perhaps the most perplexing of Washington’s bad habits is the knee-jerk regression of the newly empowered to return to the failed policies of the past. Both parties are guilty, and nowhere is this phenomenon more endemic than in America’s Middle East policy. In recent weeks, however, President Joe Biden’s administration has displayed an almost defiant opposition to recognizing the realities on the ground in the region. The Middle East has changed since Biden was last in office, and his policies should reflect the same.

 

[Hollie]

I’m thinking maybe he was hit with a big repair bill on his presidential jet.

Palestinian President Unleashes Profane Rant Against Rest of the World

Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas was recently caught badmouthing several countries, including the United States and his Arab neighbors, during a profanity-laced rant that raises new concerns about the 85-year-old leader's deteriorating health.

freebeacon.com

When asked by an unidentified attendee at the Fatah political party's April 19 meeting what his message to China is on the 100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party, Abbas went ballistic.

"Fuck the c—t of China with a shoe!" Abbas screamed, according to an independent Arabic translation of his remarks provided to the Washington Free Beacon. "That good for you?"

After pausing for a few seconds, Abbas continued yelling: "And Russia, America, and all the Arabs. What's wrong with you? All of you go to hell!"

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

The Palestinians' Right to Self-Defense - Truthdig

If the international community will not halt Israel's Gaza attack and war crimes then it must concede to the Palestinians the right to self-defense under the U.N. Charter.

www.truthdig.com

Explicit calls by various islamic terrorist franchises and by Hamas and Fatah for attacks on Israeli citizens is not self defense.

When you endorse such behavior on the part of the Arabs-Moslems, you have no case to be made for complaining about the Israeli response to stop those attacks.

Put your Pom Poms down.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

Ariel Sharon sent Efraim Halevi, who was the head of Shin Bet at the time. The Egyptians, who were the mediators, negotiated with Halevi. When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Hamas leader Ousama Hamdan discusses the resistance movement, the Hebron attacks, and Hamas' relationships with Islamic Jihad, Islamic groups in Gaza, and Syria.

www.worldpress.org

We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

Do you have a real source for this claim?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

The Palestinians' Right to Self-Defense - Truthdig

If the international community will not halt Israel's Gaza attack and war crimes then it must concede to the Palestinians the right to self-defense under the U.N. Charter.

www.truthdig.com

Explicit calls by various islamic terrorist franchises and by Hamas and Fatah for attacks on Israeli citizens is not self defense.

When you endorse such behavior on the part of the Arabs-Moslems, you have no case to be made for complaining about the Israeli response to stop those attacks.

Put your Pom Poms down.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

Ariel Sharon sent Efraim Halevi, who was the head of Shin Bet at the time. The Egyptians, who were the mediators, negotiated with Halevi. When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Hamas leader Ousama Hamdan discusses the resistance movement, the Hebron attacks, and Hamas' relationships with Islamic Jihad, Islamic groups in Gaza, and Syria.

www.worldpress.org

We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

Do you have a real source for this claim?

Indeed, the Fourth Geneva Convention.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

The Palestinians' Right to Self-Defense - Truthdig

If the international community will not halt Israel's Gaza attack and war crimes then it must concede to the Palestinians the right to self-defense under the U.N. Charter.

www.truthdig.com

Explicit calls by various islamic terrorist franchises and by Hamas and Fatah for attacks on Israeli citizens is not self defense.

When you endorse such behavior on the part of the Arabs-Moslems, you have no case to be made for complaining about the Israeli response to stop those attacks.

Put your Pom Poms down.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

Ariel Sharon sent Efraim Halevi, who was the head of Shin Bet at the time. The Egyptians, who were the mediators, negotiated with Halevi. When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Hamas leader Ousama Hamdan discusses the resistance movement, the Hebron attacks, and Hamas' relationships with Islamic Jihad, Islamic groups in Gaza, and Syria.

www.worldpress.org

We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

Do you have a real source for this claim?

Indeed, the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Post the portion you feel applies.
And the portion where the Israelis said settlers aren't civilians.