Dear GOP blog trolls: Drop Benghazi, Nobody Cares About Manufactuired Old News

[Camp]

No, obvious to all but sequestered spinners was that McLame and Romney were both "moderate-appearing" hand puppets for the old Cheney regime..

Cheney was never President, you idiot.

Sure he was. He just wore a VP disguise and put his idiot up front as the distraction. Dick Cheney, master illusionist.

 

[Silhouette]

No, obvious to all but sequestered spinners was that McLame and Romney were both "moderate-appearing" hand puppets for the old Cheney regime..

Cheney was never President, you idiot.

Sure he was. He just wore a VP disguise and put his idiot up front as the distraction. Dick Cheney, master illusionist.

Since the 1970s and counting... Hell ya. One of his idiot handpuppets that I thought was the most appropos was Ronald Reagan. He even had those lines on the sides of his mouth that made him look like an actual puppet.

Question: which one of these men were actually running the country at the time?... [hint, it's the one with the look like he's got one over on the other two..]

 

[Oldstyle]

Wow, you want the GOP to "move towards the middle"? Really? LOL The last two candidates they nominated and ran for President were the most moderate ones running! Democrats on the other hand ran and elected the man who was rated the most liberal according to voting records in the Senate. So tell me again how it's the GOP that needs to move to the center like the Democrats? I'm getting a good chuckle out of the whole concept...

No, obvious to all but sequestered spinners was that McLame and Romney were both "moderate-appearing" hand puppets for the old Cheney regime.

If the GOP put out a candidate like Christie who is willing to stand firm and tall and say "no" even when Cheney comes knocking at his door, then you'd see swarms of middle voters stepping right.

McCain is such a putz and Romney such a obvious tool that you can't imagine even people's visceral-reactive equipment has been dry docked. People get gut reactions to putzs and tools for a reason. It's an instinctive drive to avoid predators lurking behind them..

The people are starving, aching, PINING for a decisive leader who is autonomous and stands firm. Not some hand puppet for our dicktatorship of the last forty years..

What's amusing is that many Republicans were BEGGING Chris Christie to run but he declined. If he HAD run he would most likely have gotten the nomination.

I notice you didn't address my point that your call for the GOP to "move to the middle" is laughable when THEY run candidates that are close to the middle and you Democrats run people like Barack Obama and John Kerry, two men with the most liberal voting records in the US Senate.

 

[Oldstyle]

But then again this had been a common refrain from Progressives for years now...that the GOP is "extreme"...which borders on farce considering reality.

 

[Unkotare]

No, obvious to all but sequestered spinners was that McLame and Romney were both "moderate-appearing" hand puppets for the old Cheney regime..

Cheney was never President, you idiot.

Sure he was.

Here's hoping you're kidding.

 

[Unkotare]

Cheney was never President, you idiot.

Sure he was. He just wore a VP disguise and put his idiot up front as the distraction. Dick Cheney, master illusionist.

Since the 1970s and counting... Hell ya.

You are just a stone-cold idiot.

 

[HenryBHough]

If nobody cared about "old news" why in hell did anyone start a thread about it. Obviously somebody cares so very, very much!

 

[Silhouette]

Sure he was. He just wore a VP disguise and put his idiot up front as the distraction. Dick Cheney, master illusionist.

Since the 1970s and counting... Hell ya.

You are just a stone-cold idiot.

And you are an obvious career troll. How much they paying you?

 

[Unkotare]

Since the 1970s and counting... Hell ya.

You are just a stone-cold idiot.

And you are an obvious career troll. How much they paying you?

Why aren't you over on the Conspiracy Forum where you belong? And how's that evacuation of Tokyo going?

 

[Silhouette]

If nobody cared about "old news" why in hell did anyone start a thread about it. Obviously somebody cares so very, very much!

Besides hired bloggers like Unkotare, quite a few people voted to say the story of Benghazi only makes them turn away or worse, be suspicious of Fox/The GOP's obsession with it.

If I'd pulled such a ruse on the eve of the 2012 election, I wouldn't be so bold as to bring it up over and over and blame the other guys. Just sayin'. It looks bad, you know? And since Fox/GOP will never ever convince anyone of anything other than maybe the dems blundered some detail on it, there is so very much more for the GOP to lose.

Yes of course Benghazi, or rather Fox/GOP's obsession with it is big news. If you care about conservative values prevailing at all in 2014 or 2016, you would beg Fox/GOP to shut their yappers on this dead dead horse, bones bleaching white in the desert sun..

 

[hortysir]

Obama lied, Clinton lied, Rice lied------------the stupid video had nothing to do with the murder of those 4 americans. The all lied about it for political reasons, they let 4 americans die rather than admit to a terrorist attack 2 months before the election.

This is much worse than watergate where Nixon lied about his party spying on that other party-------NO ONE DIED in watergate. No one died in Monica-gate, but clinton was impeached.

Sorry, libs and obamabots, this is not going away and it will be the downfall of your kenyan messiah.

why?

Why, just when someone starts to make a great response, does it have to end with a turd?

 

[Silhouette]

You are just a stone-cold idiot.

And you are an obvious career troll. How much they paying you?

Why aren't you over on the Conspiracy Forum where you belong? And how's that evacuation of Tokyo going?

Slow and steady, just like the spread of odd ailments cropping up in kids and adults there. Cancer sometimes moves slowly from radiation. At least Russia had the honesty to tell their citizens to get the hell out of the 10,000 square mile exclusion zone immediately.

 

[freedombecki]

If nobody cared about "old news" why in hell did anyone start a thread about it. Obviously somebody cares so very, very much!

The truth about Benghazi so far has shown the incompetence of Hillary Clinton, who is the #1 liberal choice for presidential candidate in 2016. It's only right the American people be shown her weaknesses as well as her strengths. Then they can choose between her and her political opponent, whoever that may be following the Republican primary in that same year.

It's going to take a Rudy Giuliani to clean up the mess left by the Obama administration.

 

[HenryBHough]

If nobody cared about "old news" why in hell did anyone start a thread about it. Obviously somebody cares so very, very much!

The truth about Benghazi so far has shown the incompetence of Hillary Clinton, who is the #1 liberal choice for presidential candidate in 2016. It's only right the American people be shown her weaknesses as well as her strengths. Then they can choose between her and her political opponent, whoever that may be following the Republican primary in that same year.

It's going to take a Rudy Giuliani to clean up the mess left by the Obama administration.

I'd expect a RINO like that to sweep it under the rug in the interest of harmony.

 

[tinydancer]

How many threads are up saying nobody cares about Benghazi?

Rep. Gowdy will get to the bottom of this mess I hope. He was supposedly an awesome Federal Prosecutor.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

 

[candycorn]

The old guard at the GOP learns slow... Maybe they're senile?

WASHINGTON) -- Republicans are again calling for a joint committee to investigate the Obama administration's handling of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire say that there are still no clear answers as to what happened on the night of the siege that was initially blamed on a mob protesting an anti-Islam film produced in the U.S.

GOP lawmakers have charged the White House with trying to cover up the facts in order to burnish President Obama's foreign policy credentials during a heated reelection bid.

Speaking for his colleagues, McCain told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday, "We will not stop until this issue is completely well known to the American people.

Read On ABC News Radio: GOP Senators Pushing Again for Joint Committee on*Benghazi - Politics News - ABC News Radio

So, yeah. We get it. You want to witch hunt Hillary & the dems over this curiously manufactured crisis that happened, again, on "9-11" just on the eve of a pivotal election year 2012.

We all know about how middle voter people tend to vote when they are afraid of a crisis: republican, obviously...the "father figure" party. So what were terrorists thinking striking so close to a pivotal American election when doing so would surely give the GOP an advantage...when they know the GOP is the party all-about invading their countries, meddling in their affairs and all about oil? Doesn't add up.

Anyway...

Even if it did make sense and the dems were negligent, it's OLD NEWS and the GOP's illegal invasion of Iraq where tens of thousands were killed pales the story of Benghazi, where less than 10 Americans were killed.

Again, doesn't add up.

The more the GOP harps on Benghazi, the more people in the middle will lean left. It has become beyond obvious what is going on. If the GOP wants a chance, they should pay attention to the yawns and the switching of channels when they start up on it again. It's hard to stump to a crowd when they're walking away..

The short answer is that 4 dead Americans in the Middle East gets no attention, sadly, since it has been a mess ever since the end of WWI when the victors decided they could simply draw lines and separate peoples. Libya, by extension, is part of that and the same fanaticism v. dictatorship dynamic repeated itself. When the dictator was ousted, we ended up with the fanatics from different sects now being given a voice etc...

Benghazi won't be an issue when a voter goes into the booth. The hilarious thing is that it's sort of fun to see the right wing losers trying to make hay of four dead Americans. When candidates start trying it...it's likely to backfire seriously.

 

[Unkotare]

And you are an obvious career troll. How much they paying you?

Why aren't you over on the Conspiracy Forum where you belong? And how's that evacuation of Tokyo going?

Slow and steady,...

No, it's not, you mental case.

 

[Oldstyle]

The old guard at the GOP learns slow... Maybe they're senile?

WASHINGTON) -- Republicans are again calling for a joint committee to investigate the Obama administration's handling of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire say that there are still no clear answers as to what happened on the night of the siege that was initially blamed on a mob protesting an anti-Islam film produced in the U.S.

GOP lawmakers have charged the White House with trying to cover up the facts in order to burnish President Obama's foreign policy credentials during a heated reelection bid.

Speaking for his colleagues, McCain told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday, "We will not stop until this issue is completely well known to the American people.

Read On ABC News Radio: GOP Senators Pushing Again for Joint Committee on*Benghazi - Politics News - ABC News Radio

So, yeah. We get it. You want to witch hunt Hillary & the dems over this curiously manufactured crisis that happened, again, on "9-11" just on the eve of a pivotal election year 2012.

We all know about how middle voter people tend to vote when they are afraid of a crisis: republican, obviously...the "father figure" party. So what were terrorists thinking striking so close to a pivotal American election when doing so would surely give the GOP an advantage...when they know the GOP is the party all-about invading their countries, meddling in their affairs and all about oil? Doesn't add up.

Anyway...

Even if it did make sense and the dems were negligent, it's OLD NEWS and the GOP's illegal invasion of Iraq where tens of thousands were killed pales the story of Benghazi, where less than 10 Americans were killed.

Again, doesn't add up.

The more the GOP harps on Benghazi, the more people in the middle will lean left. It has become beyond obvious what is going on. If the GOP wants a chance, they should pay attention to the yawns and the switching of channels when they start up on it again. It's hard to stump to a crowd when they're walking away..

The short answer is that 4 dead Americans in the Middle East gets no attention, sadly, since it has been a mess ever since the end of WWI when the victors decided they could simply draw lines and separate peoples. Libya, by extension, is part of that and the same fanaticism v. dictatorship dynamic repeated itself. When the dictator was ousted, we ended up with the fanatics from different sects now being given a voice etc...

Benghazi won't be an issue when a voter goes into the booth. The hilarious thing is that it's sort of fun to see the right wing losers trying to make hay of four dead Americans. When candidates start trying it...it's likely to backfire seriously.

LOL...so Barry and the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight aren't to blame for Benghazi because the Middle East has been a mess since the end of WWI...is that your rationale, Candy?

I'll give you credit...it's a new way to divert attention from this White House's monumental incompetence...you want us to look at the BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG Picture and not focus on something as trivial as the death of a US Ambassador and the piss poor reaction to the crisis by our "Commander in Chief".

When the going gets tough...the tough get going! When the going gets tough for Barry...he goes to bed!

 

[candycorn]

The old guard at the GOP learns slow... Maybe they're senile?


So, yeah. We get it. You want to witch hunt Hillary & the dems over this curiously manufactured crisis that happened, again, on "9-11" just on the eve of a pivotal election year 2012.

We all know about how middle voter people tend to vote when they are afraid of a crisis: republican, obviously...the "father figure" party. So what were terrorists thinking striking so close to a pivotal American election when doing so would surely give the GOP an advantage...when they know the GOP is the party all-about invading their countries, meddling in their affairs and all about oil? Doesn't add up.

Anyway...

Even if it did make sense and the dems were negligent, it's OLD NEWS and the GOP's illegal invasion of Iraq where tens of thousands were killed pales the story of Benghazi, where less than 10 Americans were killed.

Again, doesn't add up.

The more the GOP harps on Benghazi, the more people in the middle will lean left. It has become beyond obvious what is going on. If the GOP wants a chance, they should pay attention to the yawns and the switching of channels when they start up on it again. It's hard to stump to a crowd when they're walking away..

The short answer is that 4 dead Americans in the Middle East gets no attention, sadly, since it has been a mess ever since the end of WWI when the victors decided they could simply draw lines and separate peoples. Libya, by extension, is part of that and the same fanaticism v. dictatorship dynamic repeated itself. When the dictator was ousted, we ended up with the fanatics from different sects now being given a voice etc...

Benghazi won't be an issue when a voter goes into the booth. The hilarious thing is that it's sort of fun to see the right wing losers trying to make hay of four dead Americans. When candidates start trying it...it's likely to backfire seriously.

LOL...so Barry and the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight aren't to blame for Benghazi because the Middle East has been a mess since the end of WWI...is that your rationale, Candy?

The President gets credit/blame for all of it actually. Obama gets credit for getting Bin Laden the same way he gets blame for the IRS Scandal. It was on his watch.

My message, had you chose to read it, was that 4 dead Americans in the middle east are not going to register on the consciousness of the American electorate.

I'll give you credit...it's a new way to divert attention from this White House's monumental incompetence...you want us to look at the BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG Picture and not focus on something as trivial as the death of a US Ambassador and the piss poor reaction to the crisis by our "Commander in Chief".

If Presidents are judged by their contemporaries, Obama's predacessor couldn't scramble fighters to protect NYC or Washington DC. That we couldn't get people into Libya is surprising to you?

When the going gets tough...the tough get going! When the going gets tough for Barry...he goes to bed!

Good point I suppose. Bush played golf.