Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What’s striking me is that Jews, as intelligent as they are, are behind blacks in switching their vote to the Republican.Nixon's Southern Strategy was successful because the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the War on Poverty declared the same year were followed by five years of black ghetto riots and more enduring increases in black social pathology.
If this had not happened there would never have been a southern strategy. Nixon would not have been elected. A Democrat dove would have been elected. He would have ended the War In Vietnam.
The War in Vietnam continued for seven more terrible years because most Negroes responded to the civil rights legislation and the War on Poverty the way segregationists predicted they would.
The original prediction of the civil rights movement was that when blacks were given equal rights most would begin to behave and perform as well as most whites.
When this did not happen white racial moderates felt betrayed and began to vote Republican. White grievances about Negroes are justified.
Nixon's Southern Strategy was successful because the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the War on Poverty declared the same year were followed by five years of black ghetto riots and more enduring increases in black social pathology.
If this had not happened there would never have been a southern strategy. Nixon would not have been elected. A Democrat dove would have been elected. He would have ended the War In Vietnam.
Well, since they never got equal rights, that's all just theory, isn't it?The War in Vietnam continued for seven more terrible years because most Negroes responded to the civil rights legislation and the War on Poverty the way segregationists predicted they would.
The original prediction of the civil rights movement was that when blacks were given equal rights most would begin to behave and perform as well as most whites.
If you had better reading comprehension, you would know that I did not mean that at all. What I meant is that because most Negroes are as bad as the segregationists said they are, Nixon's southern Strategy was successful.So what you are arguing is that White People are basically awful and proud of it? That's nothing to be proud of.
By 1971 polls indicated that most Americans thought America's involvement in Vietnam was a mistake. Nevertheless, Nixon was reelected by a landslide, because whites were thanking him for stopping the black ghetto riots. The riots stopped because potential rioters knew that with Nixon in the White House they would be punished severely.Not sure what you base that on. Vietnam was impossible to get out of easily due to the Cold War politics of the time. Selling out an ally to the Communists would have been seen as Treason. Nobody wanted a repeat of "Who Lost China" in our politics. (Not that China or Vietnam were ever ours to "lose".)
McGovern ran on a policy of abject surrender in Vietnam (which is what happened anyway) and lost 49 states.
Now they have superior rights with affirmative action. Fortunately that is changing.Well, since they never got equal rights, that's all just theory, isn't it?
Whites will change our minds about Negroes when most of them behave and perform as well as most of us do.Well, they passed a law in '64
To give those who ain't got a little more
But it only goes so far
Because the law don't change another's mind
When all it sees at the hiring time
Is the line on the color bar, no
Um, no, fuckwad, it wasn't all Pre-civil rights. The Civil rights struggle is ongoing today. The fact that THIS still happens...
View attachment 963989
...is proof that we have a long way to go still.
If you had better reading comprehension, you would know that I did not mean that at all. What I meant is that because most Negroes are as bad as the segregationists said they are, Nixon's southern Strategy was successful.
By 1971 polls indicated that most Americans thought America's involvement in Vietnam was a mistake. Nevertheless, Nixon was reelected by a landslide, because whites were thanking him for stopping the black ghetto riots. The riots stopped because potential rioters knew that with Nixon in the White House they would be punished severely.
Now they have superior rights with affirmative action. Fortunately that is changing.
I don't have to see a bunch of cops murder a black man over a truly petty offense to realize it's a fine example of racism.That had nothing todo with race. Nadda. There was no accusation made in court that it had a racial motive. There was no evidence of racial motive presented in court. There were no hate crime charges made. You just believe it was racially motivated due to your own implicit biases. The only racism there is you.
This is what you liberal clowns do. You make a claim but then cannot back it up with anything of substance. So you wander through a forest of circular logic.
I have known too many Negroes I liked to hate the entire race. I have had too many experiences with black criminals to have illusions about them.Actually, I know exactly what you mean... that you hate black people, and you think that is kind of acceptable.
Muskie would have given Nixon a better race. The major issues back then were the black ghetto riots, the rise in crime, and the War in Vietnam.This is where it's impossible to believe you actually lived through this time like you claim you did.
Nixon won by a landslide because McGovern was so far off on the left on every issue. Had Nixon run against someone sensible like Muskie, he'd have had a much closer race.
Again you reason from your life.The biggest beneficiary of AA has been white women.
AA just compensates for white privilege. When you get rid of white privilege, and have a TRUE meritocracy, then I will right up there with you in getting rid of AA.
But I've worked with far more Idiot Nephews than I've worked with Affirmative Action failures.
Like I said, that’s you implicit biases. You only think that because you are judging them by the color of their skin. Like a two-bit racist.I don't have to see a bunch of cops murder a black man over a truly petty offense to realize it's a fine example of racism.
I’ll let Lisa answer that one for you.But it does beg the obvious question. Why are the Jews so fucking keen to live right next to people who want to murder them?
Muskie would have given Nixon a better race. The major issues back then were the black ghetto riots, the rise in crime, and the War in Vietnam.
George McGovern spoke at my university. I sat in the front row, only feet away from him. He had the demeanor of a mainline Protest clergyman. He did not seem t be someone who would have been comfortable in a party at the Playboy Mansion.
Aside from his desire to end the War in Vietnam, which political opinions indicated most Americans agreed was a mistake, what was so terribly radical about him?
Nixon was reelected in a landslide in 1972 because there were no black ghetto riots during his first term.
Again you reason from your life.
because of the average IQ gap between whites and blacks it is not possible to achieve diversity, equity, and inclusion without lowering standards for Negroes, and discriminating against whites and Orientals.
Again you reason from your life.
Sure it is. We've already seen that even with modest equal opportunity, blacks have reduced their poverty rate from 55% to 17%.
www.heritage.org
www.amren.com
The War on Poverty After 50 Years
I have lots of original thoughts, but I like to substantiate my factual assertions., One fourth of Negroes cannot be educated and are unemployable. The only way to reduce their poverty is to give them more and more generous welfare checks.When you come up with an original thought, rather than rehashing whatever confirmation bias you find on line, let me know.
The war on Poverty reduced the black poverty rate from 55% to 17%.
I would have a hard time finding a more effective government initiative. They usually screw things up.
This is bullshit.In the 30's when Blacks were much poorer - even relatively - than they are today, their crime stats were better than comparable "whites." They were less likely to have illegitimate children. Less likely to commit serious crimes.
What happened? Seriously.
Not always.Almost no crime is the result of need. "Nobody" steals a loaf of bread to feed his or her family. Crime is the result of greed, envy, anger, or directly or indirectly, to get the money or other resources to feed a drug or alcohol addiction. While in college I spent a lot of time in juvenile court, and I never saw a single case of theft because of need. It was always want.
