Resnic
Diamond Member
- May 2, 2021
- 10,756
- 12,444
- 2,288
Not everyone has a first amendment right to speak in any manner the choose.
WW
So what did trump say that was so bad even the first amendment should be ignored?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not everyone has a first amendment right to speak in any manner the choose.
WW
You are nuttier than a bag of squirrels.They are. Leftists, like Hamas, targets women and children.
That is why Rittenhouse with an AR 15 made you poop your panties.
Hell, Iran only kills 7 year old girls.
Actually gag orders in criminal cases are not uncommon.
And specifically what language from Trump does your snowflake cult consider an "attack"And the First Amendment does not give one the "right" to attack jurors and witnesses outside the courtroom.
Or serial liar Cohen? Or the extortionist Stormy?but it's ok for media to spoil the jury pool instead? huh?
He's out on bond. He's under a gag order. Your first amendment rights hold up better when you're not in trouble.The question is fairness. If others have the right to say bad things about Trump then he should have that very same right.
Care to share any statements the prosecution has made attacking the legitimacy of the jury or witnesses?And they are typically applied to prosecution and defense. But not in Judge Merchon's courtroom
Any statements he has uttered or posted attacking the character and/or legitimacy of the jury or witnesses.And specifically what language from Trump does your snowflake cult consider an "attack"
Actually anybody else in his position would be sitting behind bars in a jail cell in a jumpsuit by now without any communication devices.The question is fairness. If others have the right to say bad things about Trump then he should have that very same right.
like any good prosecutor, only the prosecution gets to spoil the jury pool. Check out Bryan Kohberger's gag order after the prosecution told the world he was a stalker and then trying to see how many heard it isn't allowed. Strange justice system lately.Or serial liar Cohen? Or the extortionist Stormy?
Care to share any statements the prosecution has made attacking the legitimacy of the jury or witnesses?
Couldn't provide even a single one huh? You should probably STFU and not repeat the bullshit you hear form the Biden campaign on MSDNCAny statements he has uttered or posted attacking the character and/or legitimacy of the jury or witnesses.
Or having to face “Trumped up” charges, no pun…He's out on bond. He's under a gag order. Your first amendment rights hold up better when you're not in trouble.
No one else would be in his position. FatFuck Bragg reduces 60% of the felonies in NYC to misdemeanors. For Trump he elevated a misdemeanor to a felony (becasue he fucked up and let the SOL on the misdemeanor lapse).Actually anybody else in his position would be sitting behind bars in a jail cell in a jumpsuit by now without any communication devices.
So?No one else would be in his position. FatFuck Bragg reduces 60% of the felonies in NYC to misdemeanors. For Trump he elevated a misdemeanor to a felony (becasue he fucked up and let the SOL on the misdemeanor lapse).
Ummmmm, if everyone else has a first amendment right to speak then why shouldn't Trump?
They haven't reached his face yet, but he's neck deep in charges.Or having to face “Trumped up” charges, no pun…
Maybe they've just never heard of gag orders.Because the 1st amendment is not without restrictions.
Just eviscerating the premise of your rant. Carry on.
name oneBecause the 1st amendment is not without restrictions.
para bellum does not know at all what he is talking about. If you listen to him, neither will you,Trump has the right to proclaim his innocence as loud and as long as he wants to.
He is 100% free to criticize the prosecution's case, and the witnesses against him.
He cannot intimidate or coerce a juror. No one can do that, whether they are a party to the case or not. That's a crime, and should be charged when it happens.
The prosecutor's office cannot discuss the case in the public sphere because that is a violation of the rules of procedure and can taint the jury. That prohibition does not apply to the defendant.
The leftist media opines on Trump's guilt on a daily basis. Trump has every right to counter those opinions, and criticize the people who publish them.