bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,164
- 47,312
- 2,180
Actually, I just read the transcript, and Cohen was sworn in. However, that still doesn't prove jack shit.Skylar is one of the dumbest snowflakes posting in this forum. most of his threads devolve into him saying little more than "Nuh uhn!" repeatedly.I mean wow. One of the businesses I owned was a restaurant. The government red tape and regulations involved in opening that. And Trump was a developer. He must have dealt with hundreds of corrupt government officials. Government puts up their hurdles, they don't care what it costs you or if you create any jobs. They make that very clear to you.
And yet, with a special prosecutor:
- Focused only on investigating Trump
- With an unlimited budget
- Who has no time restrictions
- With no restrictions onwhat he investigates about Trump
- Who's investigating everyone and anyone Trump ever dealt with any time in their lives, not just when they were working with Trump
- Is willing to get any crime no matter how petty
- And who can even create crimes by analyzing anything said and prosecuting for any contradiction for a crime they created
And they still can't get shit on the guy. Democrats are now hanging their hats on a couple convicted criminals they hope will say anything about Trump to somehow lighten their sentences even though they're both liars.
My hats off to Trump. The guy may be a braggart and a dog to women. But wow, legally, he's incredibly clean. A round of applause
![]()
You don't know what the Mueller investigation has found regarding Trump's business dealings as those findings haven't been released yet.
So you're offering us your imagination on how 'incredibly clean' Trump is.
It's hilarious how you keep saying Trump is guilty, but if anyone argues with you then you say we don't know because Mueller hasn't released his report. You're as dumb as a brick.
And I said Trump is guilty. He needs to be fined for not filing a form. Obama did it 1,300 times, make sure Trump pays whatever Obama did divided by 1,300. It's the right thing to do
Or...me presenting evidence to prove my claims while you just make nonsense up.
Like, say....your claim that Cohen wasn't sworn in for his plea deal. You pulled that claim sideways out of your ass, backed by nothing.
I, on the other hand, had the court transcript. Which I cited and linked to. It demonstrated that Cohen was sworn in.
So its the court transcript vs. your imagination. And that has the same winner every time; Not you.