Trump Keeps Snowflakes Foaming At The Mouth With Doses Of REALITY

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Only if there is an underlying crime to commit silly girl. It is impossible to conspire to not commit a crime. But that requires an intellect and you clearly have no brain.

What are some other possible crimes that those involved in the Russian investigation could be charged with?

First, because we are in fact talking about an election, there could be violations of federal election laws. Specifically, it is a crime for a foreign national to give money or “other thing of value” in an American election. The “thing of value” could, for example, include helpful information on a candidate’s opponent.

Second, we could see charges brought for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act if Trump or members of his campaign helped the Russians obtain (meaning steal) Democratic National Committee emails or helped them use (meaning release) those emails publicly.

Finally, there is our old friend “conspiracy.” (Manfort and Gates have already been charged with this particular statue.) The law specifically defines a criminal conspiracy as two or more people “conspire[ing] either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States…” That basically means you agree to commit a crime and actually take some steps to try to commit that crime. The language about “defraud[ing] the United States” essentially refers to trying to cheat the federal government out of money or other property or trying to interfere with the functioning of the government.

Opinion | Will Trump be charged with collusion in 2018?

Hillary paying a foreign agent (Steele) for the dossier is a well-documented violation of election campaign laws. Ironic that something like that may be what takes her down.

Nixon had folks just like you. How'd that go?

Watergate Fueled Conspiracy Theories, Too

Nixon?

Wow! How pathetic and desperate you must be. Your while world is collapsing around you and you still make shit up that has nothing to do with the conversation.

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

 

[charwin95]

The wind from liberals' head spinning 'round and 'round this morning feels as strong as gale force winds in a hurricane, and there is enough foam coming from snowflake mouths for the CDC to issue a precautionary 'Rabies Epidemic' Warning' after what President Trump just said...

"EVEN IF THERE WAS COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA, 'IT'S NOT A CRIME'"
-- President Donald Trump


The most awesome thing about that comment is IT IS 100% CORRECT.


Of course there was no 'collusion' committed by President Trump, but, as he says, 'COLLUSION' IS NOT EVEN A CRIME!

'Collusion' is a made-up political propaganda-generated term created specifically to give 'weight' to the false liberal claims / campaign that President Trump engaged in SOMETHING illegal designed to 'steal' the 2016 election.

The truly remarkable and hypocritical fact about this claim by Democrats is that their false claim is EXACTLY what they did, what released DNC e-mails exposed the Democrats / Hillary did during the election:
- Evidence exists showing Hillary and the DNC she 'owned' rigged the DNC primaries, cheated in debates, engaged in election fraud, illegally used information acquired by an ex-British Spy through a company working for the Russians in a US election (a CRIME), etc. ... YET (PERHAPS AS A DISTRACTION) THEY HAVE ACCUSED THE GOP OF DOING EXACTLY WHAT EVIDENCE SHOWS THEY HAVE DONE....

Then there is what Obama himself stated - EVERY potential administration coming in gets a head-start by contacting and communicating with foreign reps....
-- Hmm, interesting how the Democrats suddenly blamed at election time - once Hillary lost - Trump for the RUSSIAN HACKING / INTERFERENCE COMEY AND OBAMA KNEW ABOUT / KNEW WAS GOIING ON SINCE 2014 YET DID NOTHING ABOUT.


But what chaps snowflakes' ass the most is that what Trump said is TRUE ' 'Collusion' is not illegal.

Even if it was, Mueller and the Democrats have found NOTHING...because there is NOTHING to find.


Trump: Even if there was collusion with Russia, 'it’s not a crime'

As I told you several times you are a liar. On top of that you are also a hypocrite.
1. You and the rest of fakey here keep blaming the democrats of this investigation.
When it’s the republican attorney general that hired to investigate a republican president. That’s fact. Majority of Americans and GOPs support Mueller.
2. If there are no collusions. Why is Trump is so scared stupid?
3. Collusions is not a crime? That depends on how deep is the collusions? But definitely Russians invaded into our democracy.
Of course Trump attorney will tell you it’s not a crime. If you ask Jeffrey Dahmer’s attorney Jeffry never ate his victims.
Trump is a corrupt scum president. That’s a fact.

 

[charwin95]

Trump is correct. Collusion is not a crime.

It would be a crime if he knowingly received gifts or donations from a foreign government. That could include data.

What if Trump was coordinating with Putin as to how Russian propaganda could be be best used? Well, first of all, why would he? I mean, surely even Donald Trump would know not to get himself into a mess like that. Especially not when he was doing such a good job of spreading propaganda on his own already.

No, I genuinely think that someone near Trump got a little too daring and stepped into hot water, but Trump himself is not stupid enough to put his neck on the chopping block like that. If he is, well ... I'm more concerned with his stupidity than his corruption, all of a sudden.

What if - nothing of the kind happened. The only way democrats can satisfy themselves is to "what if".

The democrat idea was to remove Trump from office with whatever lie would do. If a lie to remove him from office, then a lie or lies to keep him from being effective will do. That's why there is a resistance. That's what they are resisting.

Why can't everyone just stfu until the investigation is wrapped up? Just let Mueller do his job without all the bullshit and obfuscation. Even if he is not fond of President Trump, he is not just going to fabricate evidence. So rest assured; whatever he finds will be legitimate. And if there's nothing there, why keep screaming your heads off about it?

They keep telling us that collusion is not a crime so why are they attacking Mueller? Clearly they are scared of something. I am quite willing to see what happens and we will see the quality of the work.

Isn’t that funny. They are so scared defending it and keep repeating no collusions no collusions no collusions. Then blame the democrats when it’s the republicans doing the investigations.

If I’m Trump go ahead let see what you got. But don’t keep defending by keep telling no collusions no collusions and keep attacking Mueller.
Why not let him finish the job he was ask to do by the justice department. If there are no collusions then Trump is cleared.
The way they are acting I’m almost sure there is a crime committed.

 

[charwin95]

The only real collusion i see, is the Clinton Campaign purchasing a despicable phony Russian dossier on Trump. There was clear collusion with the Russians on Clinton's part. But regardless, the whole thing is a Clinton/Democrat witch hunt farce. The 'investigation' has already been comprised as well. Some of Mueller's top 'investigators' have close ties with Clinton/Democrats. It's been compromised. Time to wrap the farce up.

At the end of the day. Hillary will be impeach. Right?

 

[charwin95]

The only real collusion i see, is the Clinton Campaign purchasing a despicable phony Russian dossier on Trump. There was clear collusion with the Russians on Clinton's part. But regardless, the whole thing is a Clinton/Democrat witch hunt farce. The 'investigation' has already been comprised as well. Some of Mueller's top 'investigators' have close ties with Clinton/Democrats. It's been compromised. Time to wrap the farce up.

Typical dishonest Trump supporter. The dossier had nothing to do with Russia except for the fact that Steele used some of his Russian contacts to get information. Also DOJ guidelines do allow employees to give money to political campaigns. That is the only connection. The only farce is you and the other dishonest Trump supporters who are willing to smear out law enforcement agencies to protect your Fuerher.

She clearly colluded with the Russians. How can you deny that? If you really are so outraged over 'Collusion', you should acknowledge and condemn Clinton's collusion with the Russians. But i suspect you really aren't outraged over 'Collusion' at all. You just hate Donald Trump. You're an irrational hater at this point. It is what it is.

If Hillary colluded with the Russians 11 months later with the Republicans control the Senate, Congress and WH. How come they have not launched the investigation?
So why is the republicans investigating republican administration? Can you explain that?
Or Trump administration is so incompetent that they don’t know what the heck they are doing.

Even if they investigate Hillary. Is that mean Trump is cleared from Russian collusions?

 

[John Shaw]

Trump is correct. Collusion is not a crime.

It would be a crime if he knowingly received gifts or donations from a foreign government. That could include data.

What if Trump was coordinating with Putin as to how Russian propaganda could be be best used? Well, first of all, why would he? I mean, surely even Donald Trump would know not to get himself into a mess like that. Especially not when he was doing such a good job of spreading propaganda on his own already.

No, I genuinely think that someone near Trump got a little too daring and stepped into hot water, but Trump himself is not stupid enough to put his neck on the chopping block like that. If he is, well ... I'm more concerned with his stupidity than his corruption, all of a sudden.

Data is not a gift.

Guess that would be up to lawyers and judges to decide. The ones I've heard comment on the subject say it is, though.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump is correct. Collusion is not a crime.

It would be a crime if he knowingly received gifts or donations from a foreign government. That could include data.

What if Trump was coordinating with Putin as to how Russian propaganda could be be best used? Well, first of all, why would he? I mean, surely even Donald Trump would know not to get himself into a mess like that. Especially not when he was doing such a good job of spreading propaganda on his own already.

No, I genuinely think that someone near Trump got a little too daring and stepped into hot water, but Trump himself is not stupid enough to put his neck on the chopping block like that. If he is, well ... I'm more concerned with his stupidity than his corruption, all of a sudden.

Data is not a gift.

Guess that would be up to lawyers and judges to decide. The ones I've heard comment on the subject say it is, though.

First you have to prove that anything was given, which you have not done, nor even suggested!

 

[John Shaw]

Trump is correct. Collusion is not a crime.

It would be a crime if he knowingly received gifts or donations from a foreign government. That could include data.

What if Trump was coordinating with Putin as to how Russian propaganda could be be best used? Well, first of all, why would he? I mean, surely even Donald Trump would know not to get himself into a mess like that. Especially not when he was doing such a good job of spreading propaganda on his own already.

No, I genuinely think that someone near Trump got a little too daring and stepped into hot water, but Trump himself is not stupid enough to put his neck on the chopping block like that. If he is, well ... I'm more concerned with his stupidity than his corruption, all of a sudden.

Data is not a gift.

Guess that would be up to lawyers and judges to decide. The ones I've heard comment on the subject say it is, though.

First you have to prove that anything was given, which you have not done, nor even suggested!

I am merely relaying what I have heard from SMEs. I really have very little interest in the Russia investigation, personally. I'd rather it just get over with already.

 

[g5000]

Trump Keeps Snowflakes Foaming At The Mouth With Doses Of REALITY

This has to THE most deluded topic title in the history of this forum.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump is correct. Collusion is not a crime.

It would be a crime if he knowingly received gifts or donations from a foreign government. That could include data.

What if Trump was coordinating with Putin as to how Russian propaganda could be be best used? Well, first of all, why would he? I mean, surely even Donald Trump would know not to get himself into a mess like that. Especially not when he was doing such a good job of spreading propaganda on his own already.

No, I genuinely think that someone near Trump got a little too daring and stepped into hot water, but Trump himself is not stupid enough to put his neck on the chopping block like that. If he is, well ... I'm more concerned with his stupidity than his corruption, all of a sudden.

Data is not a gift.

Guess that would be up to lawyers and judges to decide. The ones I've heard comment on the subject say it is, though.

First you have to prove that anything was given, which you have not done, nor even suggested!

I am merely relaying what I have heard from SMEs. I really have very little interest in the Russia investigation, personally. I'd rather it just get over with already.

The biggest problem with SMEs is that they are not.

 

[John Shaw]

Trump is correct. Collusion is not a crime.

It would be a crime if he knowingly received gifts or donations from a foreign government. That could include data.

What if Trump was coordinating with Putin as to how Russian propaganda could be be best used? Well, first of all, why would he? I mean, surely even Donald Trump would know not to get himself into a mess like that. Especially not when he was doing such a good job of spreading propaganda on his own already.

No, I genuinely think that someone near Trump got a little too daring and stepped into hot water, but Trump himself is not stupid enough to put his neck on the chopping block like that. If he is, well ... I'm more concerned with his stupidity than his corruption, all of a sudden.

Data is not a gift.

Guess that would be up to lawyers and judges to decide. The ones I've heard comment on the subject say it is, though.

First you have to prove that anything was given, which you have not done, nor even suggested!

I am merely relaying what I have heard from SMEs. I really have very little interest in the Russia investigation, personally. I'd rather it just get over with already.

The biggest problem with SMEs is that they are not.

Well I guess that's the kind of attitude that leads one to believe that there's no such thing as truth or facts.

 

[iceberg]

Conspiracy is...so is obstruction of justice...

can you obstruct justice when they're going after something not a crime?

Ever heard the adage "it's not the crime, it's the cover-up"?

Flynn pled guilty. Crime committed

if not a crime, what are they covering up?

let me know when an actual crime is found.

 

[bripat9643]

Conspiracy is...so is obstruction of justice...

"Conspiricy" to do what? The obstruction of justice claim is laughable.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Trump squealed "NO COLLUSION!" 16 times.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks. And so does everyone.

OMG, Mammy can actually count. Who'da thunk it, lol. Who says leftists on here are dumber than a box of rocks, Mammy got to 16! Now remember, 17 comes after 16, not 18, lol!

So Russia has been smuggling fuel to North Korea in defiance of UN sanctions. But have we heard nary a peep from Trump about it?

And upset his ass kissing buddy Putin??

Hehehehehehe, I love watching you leftists at a loss for words as your whole narrative comes crashing down. It is sooooooooooooooooo..........patriotic-)

Why What's he doing about it ?? Once more trump is all mouth

So ya wanna go to war with China?

 

[Seawytch]

Conspiracy is...so is obstruction of justice...

"Conspiricy" to do what? The obstruction of justice claim is laughable.

I guess we will see when the investigation concludes.

 

[eddiew37]

Our big problem is we have a president with no filter He has insulted berated and mocked our allies and enemies A man in charge of the greatest nation on earth shouldn't act like an asshole and he has an army of those like him following him

 

[Seawytch]

What are some other possible crimes that those involved in the Russian investigation could be charged with?

First, because we are in fact talking about an election, there could be violations of federal election laws. Specifically, it is a crime for a foreign national to give money or “other thing of value” in an American election. The “thing of value” could, for example, include helpful information on a candidate’s opponent.

Second, we could see charges brought for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act if Trump or members of his campaign helped the Russians obtain (meaning steal) Democratic National Committee emails or helped them use (meaning release) those emails publicly.

Finally, there is our old friend “conspiracy.” (Manfort and Gates have already been charged with this particular statue.) The law specifically defines a criminal conspiracy as two or more people “conspire[ing] either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States…” That basically means you agree to commit a crime and actually take some steps to try to commit that crime. The language about “defraud[ing] the United States” essentially refers to trying to cheat the federal government out of money or other property or trying to interfere with the functioning of the government.

Opinion | Will Trump be charged with collusion in 2018?

Hillary paying a foreign agent (Steele) for the dossier is a well-documented violation of election campaign laws. Ironic that something like that may be what takes her down.

Nixon had folks just like you. How'd that go?

Watergate Fueled Conspiracy Theories, Too

Nixon?

Wow! How pathetic and desperate you must be. Your while world is collapsing around you and you still make shit up that has nothing to do with the conversation.

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hillary paying a foreign agent (Steele) for the dossier is a well-documented violation of election campaign laws. Ironic that something like that may be what takes her down.

Nixon had folks just like you. How'd that go?

Watergate Fueled Conspiracy Theories, Too

Nixon?

Wow! How pathetic and desperate you must be. Your while world is collapsing around you and you still make shit up that has nothing to do with the conversation.

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

 

[eddiew37]

Nixon had folks just like you. How'd that go?

Watergate Fueled Conspiracy Theories, Too

Nixon?

Wow! How pathetic and desperate you must be. Your while world is collapsing around you and you still make shit up that has nothing to do with the conversation.

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

 

[eddiew37]

Nixon?

Wow! How pathetic and desperate you must be. Your while world is collapsing around you and you still make shit up that has nothing to do with the conversation.

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

And more good news admiral ,,Time is on our side ,We have 3 years to get the corrupt pos And more good news We might keep getting on his case even after he leaves Sorta like your AH's did with Hillary for 30 years