After Civil War, What would the 2 Americas Look Like?

Meathead

Diamond Member
Jan 6, 2012
42,685
16,635
Theoretical, for sure, but geographically what would a divided America look like? Slivers on the Northeastern seaboard on the left coast are a given, but what of isolated cities/shitholes that dot the vast expanses in between?

What of citizenship or exchange of populations? Would a perforated country be sustainable and could the rural and urban areas function independently?

It may seem alarmist, but there cannot be much doubt that with the persecution of the leader of a great deal of the country, this could come to pass.
 
Given how much the military hates the Trump-traitors, their fantasies of Civil War would get them killed very quickly.

I suggest you _not_ FAAFO, traitor. Just stew there alone in your sore-loser fascist thoughts while drinking heavily.
 
There wouldn't be some agreed-upon new borders set up. We'd just more resemble the Middle East, where moving from state to state would require a full understanding of the intensity of the religious rule and dogma in that state.

Most of us can only hope there will be plenty of purple states, with the dynamic collaboration and innovation from Left, Right and Center that made America great. No doubt those will be the best and most stimulating places to live.
 
Given how much the military hates the Trump-traitors, their fantasies of Civil War would get them killed very quickly.

I suggest you _not_ FAAFO, traitor. Just stew there alone in your sore-loser fascist thoughts while drinking heavily.
The military would be as compromised as the FBI. Nice try, but no cigar.
 
Theoretical, for sure
No. Not theoretical. We're doing this. It's not a question of if but when.

All the commies (socialist and Marxists) should be summarily executed by disembowelment and crucifixion. Made to suffer for days before death. Followed by all welfare queens.

Then, all authoritarians will be moved to southern Utah and not allowed to leave on penalty of execution as described herein above.

Then, the rest of us will live happily ever after.
 
There wouldn't be some agreed-upon new borders set up. We'd just more resemble the Middle East, where moving from state to state would require a full understanding of the intensity of the religious rule and dogma in that state.

Most of us can only hope there will be plenty of purple states, with the dynamic collaboration and innovation from Left, Right and Center that made America great. No doubt those will be the best and most stimulating places to live.
Fuck all that stupid shit. We need yellow states, not stupid purple (the worst of both red and blue).
 
Given how much the military hates the Trump-traitors, their fantasies of Civil War would get them killed very quickly.

I suggest you _not_ FAAFO, traitor. Just stew there alone in your sore-loser fascist thoughts while drinking heavily.
qbqhdn6zff461.jpg
 
There is no way to divide the country

Even in Red States, the wealthy urban areas would control the money.
 
If a civil war starts, and I think that is a big "IF", it will be ugly and bloody.

But the post civil war will look much like it looks now, with a slightly smaller population, and horrific damage to both the physical infrastructure and the mental health of the people.

Plus, and I truly believe this, the 2nd amendment drastically changed to avoid a future civil war.
 
If a civil war starts, and I think that is a big "IF", it will be ugly and bloody.

But the post civil war will look much like it looks now, with a slightly smaller population, and horrific damage to both the physical infrastructure and the mental health of the people.

Plus, and I truly believe this, the 2nd amendment drastically changed to avoid a future civil war.
That's why we can never surrender. Death first.

Glory or Valhalla!
 
Theoretical, for sure, but geographically what would a divided America look like? Slivers on the Northeastern seaboard on the left coast are a given, but what of isolated cities/shitholes that dot the vast expanses in between?

What of citizenship or exchange of populations? Would a perforated country be sustainable and could the rural and urban areas function independently?

It may seem alarmist, but there cannot be much doubt that with the persecution of the leader of a great deal of the country, this could come to pass.

America would look conservative, because all the leftists would have ran off to Canada and Sweden.

Those who didn't run away would end up being human lawn jockeys, servants, or working in the cotton fields.
 
Given how much the military hates the Trump-traitors, their fantasies of Civil War would get them killed very quickly.

I suggest you _not_ FAAFO, traitor. Just stew there alone in your sore-loser fascist thoughts while drinking heavily.
He already admitted he'd be hiding.
 
There is no way to divide the country

Even in Red States, the wealthy urban areas would control the money.
Don't be a fool. There are no isolated urban areas that could retain any wealth much less any kind of viable economy. Chicago and Cleveland, perhaps since there is a seaway offered by the Great Lakes, but their states would be gone, making them essentially enclaves in hostile territories.
 
Last edited:
Don't be a fool. There are no isolated urban areas that could retain any wealth much less any kind of viable economy. Chicago and Cleveland, perhaps since there is a seaway offered by the Great Lakes, but their states would be gone, making the essentially enclaves in hostile territories.

Guns would not win the war
Money would
 
There are no isolated urban areas that could retain any wealth much less any kind of viable economy.

Urban areas have the ports, they have the airports, they have the rail hubs, they have the banks

Rural areas would starve
 

Forum List

Back
Top