The Death Throes of Democracy

True, but more specifically we are designed as a federal republic. I'll let you look up what that means
I don't have any books..


Wow....looks like Coulter was right again!

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
You don;t need books when you have the internet..

The Internet is like a gun. It can be a great tool if you know how to use it effectively and safely. It can be a dangerous threat to yourself and others if you don't. Unfortunately you don't or you would have used it to realize how wrong liberalism is
it also requires you to actually understand what you read ... you seem to have this problem of understanding what you read ... take for instance the laws about classified documents ... you botched that one big time

Classified documents? I think you're confusing me with someone
 
1. Funny how ironic the Liberal/Progressive motto 'from cradle to grave' turned out to be.

American democracy survived from it's birth.....the cradle.....until the primacy of the Liberals/Progressive: the regime of the 32nd President.
FDR dug its grave.

....American democracy, as defined by the United States Constitution, ended up in the grave.

Why do you hate America?

she's a RUGGED INDIVIDUALIST-------and wears a COONSKIN cap
and a Bowie knife
 
I don't have any books..


Wow....looks like Coulter was right again!

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
You don;t need books when you have the internet..

The Internet is like a gun. It can be a great tool if you know how to use it effectively and safely. It can be a dangerous threat to yourself and others if you don't. Unfortunately you don't or you would have used it to realize how wrong liberalism is
Liberalism is not one set of rules to any one person....

Actually, the biggest problem is that it is. You all not only have the same position on every issue, but you justify those idiotic positions with the same talking points.

George Patton: If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking

The problem with liberalism in a nutshell. That's why you can't even engage in lucid discussions about the issues. You would have to question your positions to do that, and you can't, it's against the programming.

Your programmed response will be to say how stupid and ridiculous what I said is, and not provide any counter examples ...
Impossible, since you all is a generalized term to mean all, which is illogical to assume that every single person may claim to be a liberal, but not all can have the same perception of being a liberal...
 
I don't have any books..


Wow....looks like Coulter was right again!

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
You don;t need books when you have the internet..

The Internet is like a gun. It can be a great tool if you know how to use it effectively and safely. It can be a dangerous threat to yourself and others if you don't. Unfortunately you don't or you would have used it to realize how wrong liberalism is
it also requires you to actually understand what you read ... you seem to have this problem of understanding what you read ... take for instance the laws about classified documents ... you botched that one big time

Classified documents? I think you're confusing me with someone
did you accuse hillary of violating the classified and top secret laws ??? the law where you claim by having a private server violated that law ??? where not only did you quoted the law but you posted it here on some of the threads ??/ if you didn't then I stand in error
 
It isn't to hard to figure that a lot of people really don't trust the masses with their own government. A case to consider is audit the fed bill. The number one argument against that is that if the masses knew what was going on they would act on every stupid impulse and tell their politicians to do those supposedly stupid things. It is better to let ELITES run it in secret so that the people can't ever object to what is going on with the nation's banking system. What if we applied that philosophy to everything our government does. We may pass a healthcare bill in secret and our elites will tell us things like 'we need to pass before you can see what is in it'...wait...that already did happen. You get the point. There was a time when people would never have tolerated this kind of crap. That was about a hundred years ago. Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us.


"Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us."


Not all of us.
 
It isn't to hard to figure that a lot of people really don't trust the masses with their own government. A case to consider is audit the fed bill. The number one argument against that is that if the masses knew what was going on they would act on every stupid impulse and tell their politicians to do those supposedly stupid things. It is better to let ELITES run it in secret so that the people can't ever object to what is going on with the nation's banking system. What if we applied that philosophy to everything our government does. We may pass a healthcare bill in secret and our elites will tell us things like 'we need to pass before you can see what is in it'...wait...that already did happen. You get the point. There was a time when people would never have tolerated this kind of crap. That was about a hundred years ago. Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us.


"Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us."


Not all of us.
If it twernt for the Heritage Foundation, you'd still be pushin' David Duke porn..
 
True, but more specifically we are designed as a federal republic. I'll let you look up what that means
I don't have any books..


Wow....looks like Coulter was right again!

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
You don;t need books when you have the internet..

The Internet is like a gun. It can be a great tool if you know how to use it effectively and safely. It can be a dangerous threat to yourself and others if you don't. Unfortunately you don't or you would have used it to realize how wrong liberalism is
Liberalism is not one set of rules to any one person....


"Liberalism is not one set of rules to any one person...."

Liberalism, socialism, Fascism, Communism, Nazism, or Progressivism....all have the same central view:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Goldberg
 
Last edited:
I don't have any books..


Wow....looks like Coulter was right again!

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
You don;t need books when you have the internet..

The Internet is like a gun. It can be a great tool if you know how to use it effectively and safely. It can be a dangerous threat to yourself and others if you don't. Unfortunately you don't or you would have used it to realize how wrong liberalism is
Liberalism is not one set of rules to any one person....


Liberalism, socialism, Fascism, Communism, Nazism, or Progressivism....all have the same central view:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Goldberg
There have been more despots of republics than ever of democracies...
 
It isn't to hard to figure that a lot of people really don't trust the masses with their own government. A case to consider is audit the fed bill. The number one argument against that is that if the masses knew what was going on they would act on every stupid impulse and tell their politicians to do those supposedly stupid things. It is better to let ELITES run it in secret so that the people can't ever object to what is going on with the nation's banking system. What if we applied that philosophy to everything our government does. We may pass a healthcare bill in secret and our elites will tell us things like 'we need to pass before you can see what is in it'...wait...that already did happen. You get the point. There was a time when people would never have tolerated this kind of crap. That was about a hundred years ago. Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us.


"Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us."


Not all of us.
If it twernt for the Heritage Foundation, you'd still be pushin' David Duke porn..



I already identified you as an inveterate liar.....

...there was no need for you to return and prove it.
 
It isn't to hard to figure that a lot of people really don't trust the masses with their own government. A case to consider is audit the fed bill. The number one argument against that is that if the masses knew what was going on they would act on every stupid impulse and tell their politicians to do those supposedly stupid things. It is better to let ELITES run it in secret so that the people can't ever object to what is going on with the nation's banking system. What if we applied that philosophy to everything our government does. We may pass a healthcare bill in secret and our elites will tell us things like 'we need to pass before you can see what is in it'...wait...that already did happen. You get the point. There was a time when people would never have tolerated this kind of crap. That was about a hundred years ago. Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us.


"Now we are all conditioned to think that our masters know what is best for us and we better not complain about all the wonderful gifts they give us."


Not all of us.
If it twernt for the Heritage Foundation, you'd still be pushin' David Duke porn..



I already identified you as an inveterate liar.....

...there was no need for you to return and prove it.
You have proven nothing but an usurper of truth, honor and dignity, because of your slanted inversion of history with a political purpose..
 


This is hardly out of character for Liberals/Progressives, whose raison d'être is the destruction of custom and tradition....both of which have been formed in the cauldron of uncountable interactions between people.
it was custom to have slaves back then, that was changed ... it was custom to force a woman to have a child that they didn't want, that was changed...it was custom when the banks failed every body failed that was changed ... it was custom when your retirement failed you failed, that was change ... it was customs if you became very ill when you were old and retired and you couldn't afford health care you failed, that was changed ... they problem you have is you don't like change ...you think change violates the constitution
 
Last edited:
Wow....looks like Coulter was right again!

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
You don;t need books when you have the internet..

The Internet is like a gun. It can be a great tool if you know how to use it effectively and safely. It can be a dangerous threat to yourself and others if you don't. Unfortunately you don't or you would have used it to realize how wrong liberalism is
Liberalism is not one set of rules to any one person....


Liberalism, socialism, Fascism, Communism, Nazism, or Progressivism....all have the same central view:

"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Goldberg
There have been more despots of republics than ever of democracies...
In your small mind, you think the USSR and The People's Republic of China are REALLY republics.
 

Forum List

Back
Top