Welcome to Trump's Economic team of Billionaires, Bankers, and Candle Stick Makers!

[owebo]

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

So, you're employed by a poor person? Huh....

Is that your answer to why, after all this time, you still think exploding the deficit with an upper class tax cut is a good move?

Exploding what deficit? Simply don't spend money you don't have....

So, how poor is your employer?

 

[gipper]

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Well clearly Obama has failed in his efforts to stimulate the economy (IMO this is purposeful as a thriving middle class does not vote for big government). Obama has so heavily regulated the economy that it can't get moving. Reducing regulations and taxation will result in economic growth...

you know? Like a GDP greater than 3%, which Big Ears amazingly couldn't achieve in his eight years.

 

[occupied]

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

 

[gipper]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Trump won the primary fair and square, unlike how Cankles stole the D nomination.

The voters voted. Just like the voters voted in two of our worst presidents in history (BO and W).

Are you suggesting we do away with allowing the people the right to vote?

I'm suggesting you should vote for whoever you want.
.

That is exactly what people ALWAYS do.

 

[Iceweasel]

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

 

[occupied]

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

So, you're employed by a poor person? Huh....

Is that your answer to why, after all this time, you still think exploding the deficit with an upper class tax cut is a good move?

Exploding what deficit? Simply don't spend money you don't have....

So, how poor is your employer?

same old answer, take money away from someone who might actually need it to give to someone who does not.

 

[owebo]

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

You mean letting employers keep their wealth?

 

[Iceweasel]

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

So, you're employed by a poor person? Huh....

Is that your answer to why, after all this time, you still think exploding the deficit with an upper class tax cut is a good move?

Exploding what deficit? Simply don't spend money you don't have....

So, how poor is your employer?

same old answer, take money away from someone who might actually need it to give to someone who does not.

When did that happen?

 

[owebo]

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

So, you're employed by a poor person? Huh....

Is that your answer to why, after all this time, you still think exploding the deficit with an upper class tax cut is a good move?

Exploding what deficit? Simply don't spend money you don't have....

So, how poor is your employer?

same old answer, take money away from someone who might actually need it to give to someone who does not.

So, is your employer so poor,mthey are on welfare?

 

[occupied]

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

 

[Conservative65]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/06/business/economy/donald-trump-economic-team.html?_r=0

The 13-member team — all men — includes several billionaire bankers and investment managers, and even a part-time professional poker player. Many have been in business with Mr. Trump before.

Trump Names Economy Team of Rich Men Who Look a Lot Like Him

Such prominent Republican academic advisers as Glenn Hubbard of the Columbia Business School and Gregory Mankiw of Harvard University also aren’t included.

Here are the massive tax breaks Trump is proposing for the rich

The presumptive Republican nominee stirred up a firestorm Sunday when he said that taxes on the wealthy would likely go up during negotiations of his plan with Congress. He later clarified that he was open to raising the top rate he proposed for the rich, but they would still pay less than they do now.


Trump has left himself a lot of room to negotiate since his plan calls for big cuts in the top tax rates. The billionaire businessman boasts that he would slash everyone's taxes, but his proposal is far more generous to the upper crust than to the average Joe.

-----------------------------------

Remember how USMB Right wing Republicans crowed about how wonderful the deficit creating Bush Tax Cuts were? Forget that millionaires and Billionaires got most of it. Everyone got a "little" something? How so many jobs were going to be created (over 42,000 factories closed).

And now, they want to elected Bush on steroids. These right wingers are so ignorant, many are saying Trump never stiffed his workers and you can't prove that he did. Even after thousands of lawsuits.

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

So Hillary's team consist of interns, kids know nothing's, WalMart workers and people like Debbie who did political favors for?

rdean makes it out as if Hillary drew names out of hat.

 

[owebo]

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

What budget? There has been no budget under Obama...

 

[gipper]

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

The phrase 'tax cuts' should not be used. The left has turned that phase into a dirty word with many uninformed and duped Americans. They need to come up with a new term.

Akin to the left dumping 'global warming' and now using 'climate change.' That worked to dupe millions...LOL.

 

[owebo]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/06/business/economy/donald-trump-economic-team.html?_r=0

The 13-member team — all men — includes several billionaire bankers and investment managers, and even a part-time professional poker player. Many have been in business with Mr. Trump before.

Trump Names Economy Team of Rich Men Who Look a Lot Like Him

Such prominent Republican academic advisers as Glenn Hubbard of the Columbia Business School and Gregory Mankiw of Harvard University also aren’t included.

Here are the massive tax breaks Trump is proposing for the rich

The presumptive Republican nominee stirred up a firestorm Sunday when he said that taxes on the wealthy would likely go up during negotiations of his plan with Congress. He later clarified that he was open to raising the top rate he proposed for the rich, but they would still pay less than they do now.


Trump has left himself a lot of room to negotiate since his plan calls for big cuts in the top tax rates. The billionaire businessman boasts that he would slash everyone's taxes, but his proposal is far more generous to the upper crust than to the average Joe.

-----------------------------------

Remember how USMB Right wing Republicans crowed about how wonderful the deficit creating Bush Tax Cuts were? Forget that millionaires and Billionaires got most of it. Everyone got a "little" something? How so many jobs were going to be created (over 42,000 factories closed).

And now, they want to elected Bush on steroids. These right wingers are so ignorant, many are saying Trump never stiffed his workers and you can't prove that he did. Even after thousands of lawsuits.

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

So Hillary's team consist of interns, kids know nothing's, WalMart workers and people like Debbie who did political favors for?

rdean makes it out as if Hillary drew names out of hat.

Of political donors...

 

[yiostheoy]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/06/business/economy/donald-trump-economic-team.html?_r=0

The 13-member team — all men — includes several billionaire bankers and investment managers, and even a part-time professional poker player. Many have been in business with Mr. Trump before.

Trump Names Economy Team of Rich Men Who Look a Lot Like Him

Such prominent Republican academic advisers as Glenn Hubbard of the Columbia Business School and Gregory Mankiw of Harvard University also aren’t included.

Here are the massive tax breaks Trump is proposing for the rich

The presumptive Republican nominee stirred up a firestorm Sunday when he said that taxes on the wealthy would likely go up during negotiations of his plan with Congress. He later clarified that he was open to raising the top rate he proposed for the rich, but they would still pay less than they do now.


Trump has left himself a lot of room to negotiate since his plan calls for big cuts in the top tax rates. The billionaire businessman boasts that he would slash everyone's taxes, but his proposal is far more generous to the upper crust than to the average Joe.

-----------------------------------

Remember how USMB Right wing Republicans crowed about how wonderful the deficit creating Bush Tax Cuts were? Forget that millionaires and Billionaires got most of it. Everyone got a "little" something? How so many jobs were going to be created (over 42,000 factories closed).

And now, they want to elected Bush on steroids. These right wingers are so ignorant, many are saying Trump never stiffed his workers and you can't prove that he did. Even after thousands of lawsuits.

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

All I smell from these con artists is more tax cuts for the rich -- same exact thing as Romney.

 

[FJO]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity and cowardice.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

 

[Conservative65]

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

Where did you get that idea? And the meme makes no sense. Taxes are based on income and people don't make the same money. A smaller percent on the rich would be more money than a middle class earner. Duh.

It's all about percentages. If a worker is paying 20% of their income in taxes, then why does someone rich like Mitt Romney pay only 14%. And that was on the only tax return he let us see.
Trump won't let us see his tax returns at all.

Obama won't let us see his college records and you're fine with that.

 

[Mac1958]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

 

[owebo]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/06/business/economy/donald-trump-economic-team.html?_r=0

The 13-member team — all men — includes several billionaire bankers and investment managers, and even a part-time professional poker player. Many have been in business with Mr. Trump before.

Trump Names Economy Team of Rich Men Who Look a Lot Like Him

Such prominent Republican academic advisers as Glenn Hubbard of the Columbia Business School and Gregory Mankiw of Harvard University also aren’t included.

Here are the massive tax breaks Trump is proposing for the rich

The presumptive Republican nominee stirred up a firestorm Sunday when he said that taxes on the wealthy would likely go up during negotiations of his plan with Congress. He later clarified that he was open to raising the top rate he proposed for the rich, but they would still pay less than they do now.


Trump has left himself a lot of room to negotiate since his plan calls for big cuts in the top tax rates. The billionaire businessman boasts that he would slash everyone's taxes, but his proposal is far more generous to the upper crust than to the average Joe.

-----------------------------------

Remember how USMB Right wing Republicans crowed about how wonderful the deficit creating Bush Tax Cuts were? Forget that millionaires and Billionaires got most of it. Everyone got a "little" something? How so many jobs were going to be created (over 42,000 factories closed).

And now, they want to elected Bush on steroids. These right wingers are so ignorant, many are saying Trump never stiffed his workers and you can't prove that he did. Even after thousands of lawsuits.

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

All I smell from these con artists is more tax cuts for the rich -- same exact thing as Romney.

You mean employers?

 

[FJO]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

Yes, it does. He gave his word not to run as third party independent.
He is not running as third party independent. He won fair and square.