Welcome to Trump's Economic team of Billionaires, Bankers, and Candle Stick Makers!

[Mac1958]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

Yes, it does. He gave his word not to run as third party independent.
He is not running as third party independent. He won fair and square.

So a man's word is his bond, only in this case?

Or do you feel that Trump is an honest man?
.

 

[occupied]

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

What budget? There has been no budget under Obama...

You people lost any claim to the fiscal responsibility badge when you held spending hostage over a routine debt ceiling raise. Took a year for the economy to recover from that shit.

 

[gipper]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

and Hillary's word?

 

[Conservative65]

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

So, you're employed by a poor person? Huh....

Is that your answer to why, after all this time, you still think exploding the deficit with an upper class tax cut is a good move?

Exploding what deficit? Simply don't spend money you don't have....

So, how poor is your employer?

same old answer, take money away from someone who might actually need it to give to someone who does not.

Seems like the Democrats propose the same old mindset, take money away from those that earned it and give it to those that didn't.

How is half of the country not paying income taxes taking away from them?

 

[Mac1958]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

and Hillary's word?

Answer the question, and I'll be happy to answer yours.
.

 

[Iceweasel]

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

What budget? There has been no budget under Obama...

You people lost any claim to the fiscal responsibility badge when you held spending hostage over a routine debt ceiling raise. Took a year for the economy to recover from that shit.

You mean obama wouldn't sign the budget because it wasn't all his way. Liberals own up to nothing and blame everyone else for everything. That's why I could never be a liberal.

 

[owebo]

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

What budget? There has been no budget under Obama...

You people lost any claim to the fiscal responsibility badge when you held spending hostage over a routine debt ceiling raise. Took a year for the economy to recover from that shit.

You mean we ran out of money to spend? And you think the fiscally responsible position is to spend more?

Do tell..

 

[Conservative65]

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

What budget? There has been no budget under Obama...

You people lost any claim to the fiscal responsibility badge when you held spending hostage over a routine debt ceiling raise. Took a year for the economy to recover from that shit.

That's funny you consider not continuing to raise the debt ceiling as being irresponsible. I bet you think the current debt of almost $20 trillion is less than what your boy had when he entered office.

 

[FJO]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

Yes, it does. He gave his word not to run as third party independent.
He is not running as third party independent. He won fair and square.

So a man's word is his bond, only in this case?

Or do you feel that Trump is an honest man?
.

Based on what we have seen Trump is every bit as honest those who gave their word and broke it.

 

[Iceweasel]

all these science loving democrats suck at math and do not understand percentages at all

We understand percentages, we just don't understand why they are still trying to use the trickle down method to stimulate the economy. Trump just showed who he really cares about and it ain't people who work for a living.

Supply side works, Reagan proved it. Liberals hate him for proving they are full of shit with trickle down from big government. Government scoops off a big chunk of the pie before passing it around.

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

Foaming over on your baby bib isn't much of an answer. Apparently all you have is hate.

 

[Mac1958]

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

Yes, it does. He gave his word not to run as third party independent.
He is not running as third party independent. He won fair and square.

So a man's word is his bond, only in this case?

Or do you feel that Trump is an honest man?
.

Based on what we have seen Trump is every bit as honest those who gave their word and broke it.

Huh?
.

 

[Conservative65]

Tax cuts look the same to on the balance sheet as spending. Giving money away to the rich is like giving ice to Eskimos.

Tax cuts for everyone is giving money to the rich? Thanks for proving how fucking retarded liberals are.

Retarded is trotting out this shit as a viable economic plan after nearly crashing the economy over the budget a few years ago. Try fixing the budget and then passing the savings on to billionaires. You people have it backwards.

What budget? There has been no budget under Obama...

You people lost any claim to the fiscal responsibility badge when you held spending hostage over a routine debt ceiling raise. Took a year for the economy to recover from that shit.

You mean we ran out of money to spend? And you think the fiscally responsible position is to spend more?

Do tell..

I thought the statement occupied made about not wanting to raise the debt ceiling as irresponsible was hilarious. It makes you wonder if in their personal lives when they can't pay but the minimum on a maxed-out credit they think it's a good idea to increase the credit line.

 

[Conservative65]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/06/business/economy/donald-trump-economic-team.html?_r=0

The 13-member team — all men — includes several billionaire bankers and investment managers, and even a part-time professional poker player. Many have been in business with Mr. Trump before.

Trump Names Economy Team of Rich Men Who Look a Lot Like Him

Such prominent Republican academic advisers as Glenn Hubbard of the Columbia Business School and Gregory Mankiw of Harvard University also aren’t included.

Here are the massive tax breaks Trump is proposing for the rich

The presumptive Republican nominee stirred up a firestorm Sunday when he said that taxes on the wealthy would likely go up during negotiations of his plan with Congress. He later clarified that he was open to raising the top rate he proposed for the rich, but they would still pay less than they do now.


Trump has left himself a lot of room to negotiate since his plan calls for big cuts in the top tax rates. The billionaire businessman boasts that he would slash everyone's taxes, but his proposal is far more generous to the upper crust than to the average Joe.

-----------------------------------

Remember how USMB Right wing Republicans crowed about how wonderful the deficit creating Bush Tax Cuts were? Forget that millionaires and Billionaires got most of it. Everyone got a "little" something? How so many jobs were going to be created (over 42,000 factories closed).

And now, they want to elected Bush on steroids. These right wingers are so ignorant, many are saying Trump never stiffed his workers and you can't prove that he did. Even after thousands of lawsuits.

Look at how the Bush Tax Cuts kickstarted the great debt. And now they want to do it again? We simply just can't allow that to happen.

So Hillary's team consist of interns, kids know nothing's, WalMart workers and people like Debbie who did political favors for?

rdean makes it out as if Hillary drew names out of hat.

Of political donors...

The way rdean talks Hillary is going to use random names.

 

[Wilbur Right]

What budget? There has been no budget under Obam

He submits a budget every year. Republicans shoot it down then do nothing.

You should know that congress controls the purse? Right? It's congress who should be doing the budget. What party controls congress? Republicans. Who isn't doing their job? Republicans.
Dumb fucks.

 

[FJO]

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

Yes, it does. He gave his word not to run as third party independent.
He is not running as third party independent. He won fair and square.

So a man's word is his bond, only in this case?

Or do you feel that Trump is an honest man?
.

Based on what we have seen Trump is every bit as honest those who gave their word and broke it.

Huh?
.

OK, let me try to clarify: Trump is no less honest than the liars who gave their word and lied.

 

[owebo]

What budget? There has been no budget under Obam

He submits a budget every year. Republicans shoot it down then do nothing.

You should know that congress controls the purse? Right? It's congress who should be doing the budget. What party controls congress? Republicans. Who isn't doing their job? Republicans.
Dumb fucks.

Again...what budget? You should know we elect a potus to set a budget with we the people...

 

[owebo]

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

Yes, it does. He gave his word not to run as third party independent.
He is not running as third party independent. He won fair and square.

So a man's word is his bond, only in this case?

Or do you feel that Trump is an honest man?
.

Based on what we have seen Trump is every bit as honest those who gave their word and broke it.

Huh?
.

OK, let me try to clarify: Trump is no less honest than the liars who gave their word and lied.

How so?

 

[gipper]

If the Rs can't beat a lying corrupt criminal warmonger owned by the 1%, then they as a party should pass into history.

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

and Hillary's word?

Answer the question, and I'll be happy to answer yours.
.

I would hope that by now, you have come to understand that a politician's word is worthless.

One thing we know for sure, Hillary is a prolific liar. She lies about lies. So, pick 'em.

 

[Mac1958]

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

Yes, it does. He gave his word not to run as third party independent.
He is not running as third party independent. He won fair and square.

So a man's word is his bond, only in this case?

Or do you feel that Trump is an honest man?
.

Based on what we have seen Trump is every bit as honest those who gave their word and broke it.

Huh?
.

OK, let me try to clarify: Trump is no less honest than the liars who gave their word and lied.

Then I don't understand how "a man's word is his bond" applies. It clearly does not.

And back to the point - Kasich/Rubio would have beaten Hillary, a VERY vulnerable candidate. This temper tantrum that 40% of the GOP has thrown was a wasted opportunity of historic proportions - made even more bizarre by the fact that they ran a guy who they admit isn't even a conservative. Suddenly it was about nationalism and populism, and Reagan was thrown under the bus.

I can't believe how lucky the Dems are.
.

 

[owebo]

She's vulnerable, indeed, but then the GOP runs Trump instead of sane ticket like Kasich/Rubio.

You can't change the ship around before slowing it down first.

Talk about a wasted opportunity. Perhaps their last.
.

Kasich and Rubio and the rest of all 16 contenders gave their word that they would support the eventual winner of the primary. They did that because they were afraid that given certain circumstances Trump would run as third party independent. In other words Their pledge was nothing but a thinly veiled at displaying their true character, which is mostly dominated by sanctimonious and pompous vanity.

A man's word is his bond.

Those who break their given words are lying low lives. Including Kasich and Rubio.

Does "a man's word is his bond" apply to Trump?
.

and Hillary's word?

Answer the question, and I'll be happy to answer yours.
.

I would hope that by now, you have come to understand that a politician's word is worthless.

One thing we know for sure, Hillary is a prolific liar. She lies about lies. So, pick 'em.

I like that Trump is not a politician....