What do leftists stand for, or care about, that the GOP is allegedly trying to destroy?

[tycho1572]

Here’s another example of obama’s EPA being out of control, Timmy....


This is why the Trump administration is fixing the EPA.

 

[koshergrl]

Here’s another example of obama’s EPA being out of control, Timmy....


This is why the Trump administration is fixing the EPA.

It can't be fixed, it shouldn't exist. All of these agencies are unconstitutional..they're nothing but goons.

 

[tycho1572]

Here’s another example of obama’s EPA being out of control, Timmy....


This is why the Trump administration is fixing the EPA.

It can't be fixed, it shouldn't exist. All of these agencies are unconstitutional..they're nothing but goons.

I can see the EPA being useful if their power is kept in check. That’s something the Trump admin is working on.
It’s also what Timmy is whining about. That little tard thinks our government should be allowed to do what we just saw in the two vids I posted.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I’ll start!

The environment! Cons want to eliminate the EPA . One of the most successful agencies ever . And role back all kinds of environment regs and laws. All in a effort to appease their big biz masters

The only thing that really got the EPA in trouble with the public was their unreasonable stance on certain issues and actions they took against private landowners. Most people will tolerate a certain level of government interference, but when the EPA tells a private landowner that he/she cannot graze cattle or otherwise make use of their own property, and do so without providing an avenue of due process or appeal, you get serious blowback. Big Biz is only too happy to propagandize that situation to the point where everybody hates the EPA and wants it gone.

No one says the epa is perfect . They can use some reigning in sometimes . But cons want to throw the baby out with the bath water .

You wanted an example . That’s mine .

Yeah, not at ALL like the left wanting to throw out the Electoral College and the Senate and rework the composition of the Supreme Court just because they lost an election, and protesting to abolish ICE because they might actually enforce border laws. Those are all completely normal and sane; replacing the EPA, however, is radical!

Ice has only been in place for what? 15 years?

They should be spun back into the INS where we had enforcement since forever .

So NOW it's a matter of amount of time making something "legitimate"? Are you aware that we've had the Electoral College and the Senate since the late 18th century?

 

[Cecilie1200]

To what was the sea-hag referring?


I honestly would like to know specifics. I may agree with her.

According to one of your fellow far right wing nuts, this is what the GOP is trying to accomplish...

1. No illegal aliens

2. No abortion

3. No Affirmative Action

4. No Muslim immigration/travel.

5. No gun-free zones.

6. No same sex marriage. Homosexuality may be banned from TV and movies too.

7. No national anthem kneeling.

8. No sanctuary cities.

9. No idiocy.

10. Plenty of common sense.

Which accomplishes the dual goal of NOT answering the actual question, and also attempting to make one person responsible for the words of some unknown random person.

Way to multitask!

Well, I am not a leftist so I do not know what they worry about, but this list seemed a good starting point. And while it is just the words of one person, there were more than a dozen of his fellow right wing nuts that responded to the thread and not a single one of them took issue with a single thing on the list, indicating their approval of the list.

Amazing how that still doesn't make other people responsible for it.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

To what was the sea-hag referring?


I honestly would like to know specifics. I may agree with her.

According to one of your fellow far right wing nuts, this is what the GOP is trying to accomplish...

1. No illegal aliens

2. No abortion

3. No Affirmative Action

4. No Muslim immigration/travel.

5. No gun-free zones.

6. No same sex marriage. Homosexuality may be banned from TV and movies too.

7. No national anthem kneeling.

8. No sanctuary cities.

9. No idiocy.

10. Plenty of common sense.

Which accomplishes the dual goal of NOT answering the actual question, and also attempting to make one person responsible for the words of some unknown random person.

Way to multitask!

Well, I am not a leftist so I do not know what they worry about, but this list seemed a good starting point. And while it is just the words of one person, there were more than a dozen of his fellow right wing nuts that responded to the thread and not a single one of them took issue with a single thing on the list, indicating their approval of the list.

Amazing how that still doesn't make other people responsible for it.

No, but it does indicate they do not disagree with it, people on this forum have no problem voicing their disapproval.

 

[Cecilie1200]

To what was the sea-hag referring?


I honestly would like to know specifics. I may agree with her.

According to one of your fellow far right wing nuts, this is what the GOP is trying to accomplish...

1. No illegal aliens

2. No abortion

3. No Affirmative Action

4. No Muslim immigration/travel.

5. No gun-free zones.

6. No same sex marriage. Homosexuality may be banned from TV and movies too.

7. No national anthem kneeling.

8. No sanctuary cities.

9. No idiocy.

10. Plenty of common sense.

Which accomplishes the dual goal of NOT answering the actual question, and also attempting to make one person responsible for the words of some unknown random person.

Way to multitask!

Well, I am not a leftist so I do not know what they worry about, but this list seemed a good starting point. And while it is just the words of one person, there were more than a dozen of his fellow right wing nuts that responded to the thread and not a single one of them took issue with a single thing on the list, indicating their approval of the list.

Amazing how that still doesn't make other people responsible for it.

No, but it does indicate they do not disagree with it, people on this forum have no problem voicing their disapproval.

No, it indicates that a bunch of unnamed people do not disagree with it. It indicates fuck and all about anyone NOT in that group.

Apparently, it also indicates that you're willing to do a lot of tarring with a broad brush that you would be screaming about if it were done to people on the left.

When I EXPRESSLY agree with something, THEN you may hold me responsible for it. Until then, fuck you. I don't know for sure that Bootney feels the same way, but I'd be willing to bet money on it.

 

[koshergrl]

Here’s another example of obama’s EPA being out of control, Timmy....


This is why the Trump administration is fixing the EPA.

It can't be fixed, it shouldn't exist. All of these agencies are unconstitutional..they're nothing but goons.

I can see the EPA being useful if their power is kept in check. That’s something the Trump admin is working on.
It’s also what Timmy is whining about. That little tard thinks our government should be allowed to do what we just saw in the two vids I posted.

No, they aren't useful. They are unconstitutional in concept, scope, and application. They should never have been created in the first place, and their ONLY purpose is to violate the constitutionally protected rights of people who own property or have property rights to resources.

 

[tycho1572]

Here’s another example of obama’s EPA being out of control, Timmy....


This is why the Trump administration is fixing the EPA.

It can't be fixed, it shouldn't exist. All of these agencies are unconstitutional..they're nothing but goons.

I can see the EPA being useful if their power is kept in check. That’s something the Trump admin is working on.
It’s also what Timmy is whining about. That little tard thinks our government should be allowed to do what we just saw in the two vids I posted.

No, they aren't useful. They are unconstitutional.

They do have a useful purpose.

 

[koshergrl]

Here’s another example of obama’s EPA being out of control, Timmy....


This is why the Trump administration is fixing the EPA.

It can't be fixed, it shouldn't exist. All of these agencies are unconstitutional..they're nothing but goons.

I can see the EPA being useful if their power is kept in check. That’s something the Trump admin is working on.
It’s also what Timmy is whining about. That little tard thinks our government should be allowed to do what we just saw in the two vids I posted.

No, they aren't useful. They are unconstitutional.

They do have a useful purpose.

No, they don't. It's a racket, it's always been a racket. The EPA removes power from land owners, farmers, ranchers, and cities, and forces them to do business with their buddies.

PAUL: EPA regulations violate constitutional rights

 

[boedicca]

To what was the sea-hag referring?


I honestly would like to know specifics. I may agree with her.

Given the recent LW antics during the Kavanaugh Fracas, what leftists appear to care about is incompetency, lunacy, and self-absorption. It's not a good look.

And this is the truest thing I've read today...and why the Dems are doomed if they can't move back to a moderate set of policies promoted by Mostly Normal people.

I’ve said it before, but when you embrace intersectional feminism, postmodern identity politics, and socialist economics as the three-legged stool of your political philosophy you’re not going to attract a lot of people grounded in the kind of reality necessary to do objectively good work — and sooner or later it’s going to become obvious that none of your people can make your trains run on time...

Five Lessons About the Left

 

[Pete7469]

More irrelevant BS. I repeat: If Republicans want clean air and water, what specifically, are they prepared to do to address these things?

I TOLD YOU WHAT THEY DID ASSFUCK.

They CREATED the fucking EPA, and leftist assholes like you took it over and started regulating puddles in people's yards and those stories pissed people off. Like that shit Whory Reid and that meat puppet faggot tried to pull in Nevada with the BLM.

Now you have backlash, people want the balls cut off the government.

BTW it absolutely is relevant that you can expect to drink out of just about any tap, and just about any stream I've ever fished in.

 

[Bush92]

To what was the sea-hag referring?


I honestly would like to know specifics. I may agree with her.

If things keep getting better the leftist will have nothing to whine and cry about.

 

[Bush92]

More irrelevant BS. I repeat: If Republicans want clean air and water, what specifically, are they prepared to do to address these things?

I TOLD YOU WHAT THEY DID ASSFUCK.

They CREATED the fucking EPA, and leftist assholes like you took it over and started regulating puddles in people's yards and those stories pissed people off. Like that shit Whory Reid and that meat puppet faggot tried to pull in Nevada with the BLM.

Now you have backlash, people want the balls cut off the government.

BTW it absolutely is relevant that you can expect to drink out of just about any tap, and just about any stream I've ever fished in.

Nixon signed it into law.

 

[koshergrl]

More irrelevant BS. I repeat: If Republicans want clean air and water, what specifically, are they prepared to do to address these things?

I TOLD YOU WHAT THEY DID ASSFUCK.

They CREATED the fucking EPA, and leftist assholes like you took it over and started regulating puddles in people's yards and those stories pissed people off. Like that shit Whory Reid and that meat puppet faggot tried to pull in Nevada with the BLM.

Now you have backlash, people want the balls cut off the government.

BTW it absolutely is relevant that you can expect to drink out of just about any tap, and just about any stream I've ever fished in.

The epa hasn't made anything safer or better. They take credit for things that would have happened, at a far lower cost, and which would not have resulted in the decimation of industry and production.

 

[Bush92]

To what was the sea-hag referring?


I honestly would like to know specifics. I may agree with her.

Sanity and truth. Some fo the things I see GOP supporters state on this forum tells me they are either retarded or naive.

The very first post I read of yours I knew you were both.

 

[LoneLaugher]

How does protecting your family from a documented threat at home have anything to do with a private citizen carrying around a gun? Did you think about what I said?

Now even if he did have a armed security detail protecting him in public he has a specific reason. He is famous. Most people are not famous and dont have the threats to their safety that a famous person would. That would be like expecting the POTUS to not have the CIA protecting him because he was anti gun.

Most people who are not famous get assaulted, robbed, raped, and murdered. Why does he get special treatment? This is complete bullshit.

What? Most people?

 

[rightwinger]

I’ll start!

The environment! Cons want to eliminate the EPA . One of the most successful agencies ever . And role back all kinds of environment regs and laws. All in a effort to appease their big biz masters

The only thing that really got the EPA in trouble with the public was their unreasonable stance on certain issues and actions they took against private landowners. Most people will tolerate a certain level of government interference, but when the EPA tells a private landowner that he/she cannot graze cattle or otherwise make use of their own property, and do so without providing an avenue of due process or appeal, you get serious blowback. Big Biz is only too happy to propagandize that situation to the point where everybody hates the EPA and wants it gone.

No one says the epa is perfect . They can use some reigning in sometimes . But cons want to throw the baby out with the bath water .

You wanted an example . That’s mine .

I trust the EPA more than I trust the Capitalists feeding the Republicans propaganda

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Because he can afford to hire professionals should he need an armed force in public. Thats like asking why do some people get to buy a mercedes benz.

So, some people get to arm up, while we the peasants are fucked?

Are you sure you are a proponent of the little guy?

 

[NightFox]

Because he can afford to hire professionals should he need an armed force in public. Thats like asking why do some people get to buy a mercedes benz.

So, some people get to arm up, while we the peasants are fucked?

Yep, The aristocrats get the guns and the common folk get forks, spoons and harsh language, makes perfect sense.

…. if you happen to be Cersei Lannister.