Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biden insisted that female members of his Secret Security detail watch him as he swam naked in front of him. 'He spend most of the day pissed....still does.Biden was quite satisfied with the traditional role of VP and did not attempt to form his own empire.So you think another dick chenny will run the country? no not possible Trump is not an idiot like Bush Jr..
Trump might not be as stupid as Jr. was, but he is totally clueless about what happens politically, Pence isn't.
And Pence could use his political experience to pull Trump's strings quite easily.
Unlike that boob Biden, Pence is presidential, a welcome relief
Obama set himself up with yes men it was a pathetic mess.
Trump is gonna do the same thing. If you don't adore him, he doesn't like you, so yes men are going to be the order of the day for Trump.
If the DEMs want a shooting war they know where to find it.Some people just want to see the world burn, you might get your wish.I look forward to 4 (to 8!) years of LWNJ screaming!!
TRUMP!!!!
So you is going to "drive him out of office"?What's really going on is yet another stupid response your messiah has made to legitimate criticism. If this is going to be his pattern of behavior as president he will be driven from office without a friend in the world or anyone who will ever admit voting for him.Not very good at arithmetic? Only half of her lead would have to be illegal for Trump to win the state and less than that for him to have won the popular vote nationally. Why don't you just admit you only post about your feelings and not about what is really going on?The very idea that every third or fourth person in line to vote in California was an illegal immigrant is fucktarded.lol It is ridiculous to keep saying it is ridiculous without providing any explanation. Do you actually have any idea why you think it is ridiculous?Still ridiculous. People like you are why propaganda works.Nope, it's a fact, until we know how many of the millions of illegal immigrants living in California voted we don't know who won the legal vote in the state.
So you are claiming there was not a single vote cast by an illegal immigrant?LOLNot very good at arithmetic? Only half of her lead would have to be illegal for Trump to win the state and less than that for him to have won the popular vote nationally. Why don't you just admit you only post about your feelings and not about what is really going on?The very idea that every third or fourth person in line to vote in California was an illegal immigrant is fucktarded.lol It is ridiculous to keep saying it is ridiculous without providing any explanation. Do you actually have any idea why you think it is ridiculous?Still ridiculous. People like you are why propaganda works.
Have you found even one illegal alien who voted in California?
LOLOLOLOLLook, we all, even you, believe some illegals voted in the election, but there is disagreement about how many. Was it enough to actually throw the election to Clinton or was it a much smaller number?How would a hand recount evaluate voters' legal status when a recount only reviews the votes for president? How do ballots reveal the voter? There are no names on ballots. What you're seeking is not a recount but an investigation which would look into everyone who voted.An automatic recount wouldn't uncover voter fraud, but a hand recount would, so are you objecting to a hand recount because you suspect it would reveal large numbers of Illegals voted for Clinton, perhaps enough to have taken the state away from Trump? Why don't you come clean and admit it?Oh, great. Now you're conflating recounting ballots with investigating voter-fraud.So you support a recount only if the Democrats who run California want it? In other words, if they want to allow millions of illegals to vote you support that?I think it's a waste of time and money but if Californians want to do it, I couldn't care less.
Now stop stalling.... where's your evidence that millions of illegals voted for Hillary...?Recounting entails either an automatic recount where the ballots are placed back into counting machines to be recounted; or, a manual recount where election officials hand count the votes for president. It does not include any investigation into the legal status of every individual voter. So I'm not seeing how a recount will possibly turn up millions of illegal alien votes for Hillary.
That aside, Do you think I'm the only one who's noticing that you're refusing to post any evidence that millions of illegal aliens may have voted for Hillary in California? Are you avoiding posting any such evidence because in truth you don't actually have any?
And again I note, you still haven't posted any evidence whatsoever that millions of illegals voted in California, though you think they did.
This is a great example of you posting based on nothing but feelings and not from reality -- which you project onto others.
As a practical matter, it won't be possible to determine the extent of voter fraud encouraged by Clinton, Obama and the California Democrats, but the good news is it didn't influence the election.
I have read a driver's license is sufficient.So you are claiming there was not a single vote cast by an illegal immigrant?LOLNot very good at arithmetic? Only half of her lead would have to be illegal for Trump to win the state and less than that for him to have won the popular vote nationally. Why don't you just admit you only post about your feelings and not about what is really going on?The very idea that every third or fourth person in line to vote in California was an illegal immigrant is fucktarded.lol It is ridiculous to keep saying it is ridiculous without providing any explanation. Do you actually have any idea why you think it is ridiculous?
Have you found even one illegal alien who voted in California?
What documentation is required when registering to vote in California?
Now why would you want to lie about this? I said it might be the case that enough illegals voted to have stolen the state for Clinton and you said you didn't believe a single illegal voted in the election.LOLOLOLOLLook, we all, even you, believe some illegals voted in the election, but there is disagreement about how many. Was it enough to actually throw the election to Clinton or was it a much smaller number?How would a hand recount evaluate voters' legal status when a recount only reviews the votes for president? How do ballots reveal the voter? There are no names on ballots. What you're seeking is not a recount but an investigation which would look into everyone who voted.An automatic recount wouldn't uncover voter fraud, but a hand recount would, so are you objecting to a hand recount because you suspect it would reveal large numbers of Illegals voted for Clinton, perhaps enough to have taken the state away from Trump? Why don't you come clean and admit it?Oh, great. Now you're conflating recounting ballots with investigating voter-fraud.So you support a recount only if the Democrats who run California want it? In other words, if they want to allow millions of illegals to vote you support that?
That aside, Do you think I'm the only one who's noticing that you're refusing to post any evidence that millions of illegal aliens may have voted for Hillary in California? Are you avoiding posting any such evidence because in truth you don't actually have any?
And again I note, you still haven't posted any evidence whatsoever that millions of illegals voted in California, though you think they did.
This is a great example of you posting based on nothing but feelings and not from reality -- which you project onto others.
As a practical matter, it won't be possible to determine the extent of voter fraud encouraged by Clinton, Obama and the California Democrats, but the good news is it didn't influence the election.
I take this to mean you were bullshitting when you said there's evidence Trump was right when he claimed there are millions of votes cast by illegal aliens. There is no such evidence.
Why didn't you just admit that from the start rather than drag this on?
How many illegals do you believe voted?You know, in this day and age, there are things that are too big or have too many people to keep quiet.
I think that if there were over 3 MILLION illegal voters (that's a full percent of the population of this country btw), SOMEONE would have caught on by now.
I think I'll wait for the election officials to tell me what they think happened, rather than trust a tweet from a bloviating narcissist.
How many illegals do you believe voted?You know, in this day and age, there are things that are too big or have too many people to keep quiet.
I think that if there were over 3 MILLION illegal voters (that's a full percent of the population of this country btw), SOMEONE would have caught on by now.
I think I'll wait for the election officials to tell me what they think happened, rather than trust a tweet from a bloviating narcissist.
I have read a driver's license is sufficient.So you are claiming there was not a single vote cast by an illegal immigrant?LOLNot very good at arithmetic? Only half of her lead would have to be illegal for Trump to win the state and less than that for him to have won the popular vote nationally. Why don't you just admit you only post about your feelings and not about what is really going on?The very idea that every third or fourth person in line to vote in California was an illegal immigrant is fucktarded.
Have you found even one illegal alien who voted in California?
What documentation is required when registering to vote in California?
LOLOLNow why would you want to lie about this? I said it might be the case that enough illegals voted to have stolen the state for Clinton and you said you didn't believe a single illegal voted in the election.LOLOLOLOLLook, we all, even you, believe some illegals voted in the election, but there is disagreement about how many. Was it enough to actually throw the election to Clinton or was it a much smaller number?How would a hand recount evaluate voters' legal status when a recount only reviews the votes for president? How do ballots reveal the voter? There are no names on ballots. What you're seeking is not a recount but an investigation which would look into everyone who voted.An automatic recount wouldn't uncover voter fraud, but a hand recount would, so are you objecting to a hand recount because you suspect it would reveal large numbers of Illegals voted for Clinton, perhaps enough to have taken the state away from Trump? Why don't you come clean and admit it?Oh, great. Now you're conflating recounting ballots with investigating voter-fraud.
That aside, Do you think I'm the only one who's noticing that you're refusing to post any evidence that millions of illegal aliens may have voted for Hillary in California? Are you avoiding posting any such evidence because in truth you don't actually have any?
And again I note, you still haven't posted any evidence whatsoever that millions of illegals voted in California, though you think they did.
This is a great example of you posting based on nothing but feelings and not from reality -- which you project onto others.
As a practical matter, it won't be possible to determine the extent of voter fraud encouraged by Clinton, Obama and the California Democrats, but the good news is it didn't influence the election.
I take this to mean you were bullshitting when you said there's evidence Trump was right when he claimed there are millions of votes cast by illegal aliens. There is no such evidence.
Why didn't you just admit that from the start rather than drag this on?
The real issue is whether Trump was right in claiming 3,000,000 illegals voted, and there is evidence that gives credibility to that claim.
You need to go back to your remedial reading class. The issue is whether there is evidence. Were you not so slow witted or dishonest, you would understand that raises the question about whether there is evidence or not.LOLOLNow why would you want to lie about this? I said it might be the case that enough illegals voted to have stolen the state for Clinton and you said you didn't believe a single illegal voted in the election.LOLOLOLOLLook, we all, even you, believe some illegals voted in the election, but there is disagreement about how many. Was it enough to actually throw the election to Clinton or was it a much smaller number?How would a hand recount evaluate voters' legal status when a recount only reviews the votes for president? How do ballots reveal the voter? There are no names on ballots. What you're seeking is not a recount but an investigation which would look into everyone who voted.An automatic recount wouldn't uncover voter fraud, but a hand recount would, so are you objecting to a hand recount because you suspect it would reveal large numbers of Illegals voted for Clinton, perhaps enough to have taken the state away from Trump? Why don't you come clean and admit it?
And again I note, you still haven't posted any evidence whatsoever that millions of illegals voted in California, though you think they did.
This is a great example of you posting based on nothing but feelings and not from reality -- which you project onto others.
As a practical matter, it won't be possible to determine the extent of voter fraud encouraged by Clinton, Obama and the California Democrats, but the good news is it didn't influence the election.
I take this to mean you were bullshitting when you said there's evidence Trump was right when he claimed there are millions of votes cast by illegal aliens. There is no such evidence.
Why didn't you just admit that from the start rather than drag this on?
You even lie about lying...
So there you are, claiming there's evidence that millions of illegals voted, yet when challenged to post said evidence, you run away like Trump running from a protester holding up a sign reading, "Republicans against Trump."The real issue is whether Trump was right in claiming 3,000,000 illegals voted, and there is evidence that gives credibility to that claim.
It that's his strength, then country is in real trouble.He will just delegate everything to Pence while he tweets.If he is this disinterested now, his attitude 4 years from now is somewhat worrying.
He's gotta go with his strengths, right?
Email the Electoral College
LOLOLYou need to go back to your remedial reading class. The issue is whether there is evidence. Were you not so slow witted or dishonest, you would understand that raises the question about whether there is evidence or not.LOLOLNow why would you want to lie about this? I said it might be the case that enough illegals voted to have stolen the state for Clinton and you said you didn't believe a single illegal voted in the election.LOLOLOLOLLook, we all, even you, believe some illegals voted in the election, but there is disagreement about how many. Was it enough to actually throw the election to Clinton or was it a much smaller number?How would a hand recount evaluate voters' legal status when a recount only reviews the votes for president? How do ballots reveal the voter? There are no names on ballots. What you're seeking is not a recount but an investigation which would look into everyone who voted.
And again I note, you still haven't posted any evidence whatsoever that millions of illegals voted in California, though you think they did.
This is a great example of you posting based on nothing but feelings and not from reality -- which you project onto others.
As a practical matter, it won't be possible to determine the extent of voter fraud encouraged by Clinton, Obama and the California Democrats, but the good news is it didn't influence the election.
I take this to mean you were bullshitting when you said there's evidence Trump was right when he claimed there are millions of votes cast by illegal aliens. There is no such evidence.
Why didn't you just admit that from the start rather than drag this on?
You even lie about lying...
So there you are, claiming there's evidence that millions of illegals voted, yet when challenged to post said evidence, you run away like Trump running from a protester holding up a sign reading, "Republicans against Trump."The real issue is whether Trump was right in claiming 3,000,000 illegals voted, and there is evidence that gives credibility to that claim.
Trump as usually makes claims that can't be verified. Since there is no accurate information as to the number of illegal immigrants and even less information about the number who actually voted illegally what he says can't be disproved.Trump said there was evidence that 3 MILLION voters did so illegally. Unfortunately for him, there isn't any.
