Sure sounds like you are.News flash, NOBODY is jealous of Muslims.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure sounds like you are.News flash, NOBODY is jealous of Muslims.
Sure sounds like you are.
There have been claims recently that Islam is a feminist religion, but chapter 4 of the Quran states that a woman’s testimony is worth half of a man’s, male heirs are to receive twice the inheritance of female heirs and husbands have the right to beat disobedient wives. Does this sound feminist to anyone?
How does "everyone" benefit?
It's almost as if you're supporting my statement.Could you qualify that statement? People who
fight oppression are acting in SELF DEFENSE in
that "self defense" includes attack on ones country
or one's nation and in a larger sense ALSO includes
fighting attack on fellow humans (from the POV of
biologists, humans are a "social animal" and
protect the SPECIES---a form of self-defense)
You complicate anything simple.what women? A few hundred years ago there
were women who were QUEENS. Queen Isabella
of Spain had LOTS OF RIGHTS ----you are trying to simplify a very complex topic
But you don't deny that her reasoning is illogical.It’s her right and no one has the right to say she can’t.
Well maybe you can put it into short writing so we can do something with it. I don't mind refuting their baseless lies.Because I’ve never been a Muslim, it seemed only natural to have those born into the religion telling us why they left.
First of all saying Jesus (peace be upon him) is god and god's son at the same time is no less illogical than you saying you are your father and your fathers son.Why does Islam reject Jesus Christ, son of God who is God as Messiah
I've seen many claims - none made any sense.Messiah and His sacrifice and resurrection are all pointed to in The Old Testament
"almost"? nope---I am describing absurdIt's almost as if you're supporting my statement.
Suradie's lack of simple factual knowledge is amazing. "inhertance" in the discussion which she![]()
The Bible Says What? Women only inherit when there’s no men - Jewish News
Rabbi Sandra Kviat takes a controversial topic from the Torah and looks at a progressive responsewww.jewishnews.co.uk
Yes. Women couldn't inherit land unless there were no sons.Suradie's lack of simple factual knowledge is amazing. "inhertance" in the discussion which she
sites with absolutely no understanding refers ONLY
to the "inheritance" of fixed tribal land. Back in the
day, each of the "tribes" owned land (except for me--LEVI) That land was passed down thru the male line.
The custom and law does not refer to mom's
diamond ring or dad's gold watch or the contents
of the safety deposit box. The system no longer
exists---for more than 2000 years
where?Yes. Women couldn't inherit land unless there were no sons.
Remember the story of Ruth? Naomi was cleaning in the fields.where?
wrong again----Ruth was GLEANING---which meansRemember the story of Ruth? Naomi was cleaning in the fields.
in islamic law-----if a man has two sons and onewhere?
You're right. Ruth was gleaning for Naomi in the fields of Boaz. We were talking about women's rights...wrong again----Ruth was GLEANING---which means
picking up produce for free----Naomi stayed home.
Sheeeesh You seem to have a problem
remember that which you read. I never had an
actual education in religion----your sunday school
education failed---no jelly bean for you. BTW --what
does your misstatement have to do with the subject
at hand?